Cadastres -- United States; Mineral resources conservation -- United States
There is no objection to monumenting corners that fall on patented land.
If they fall in a cultivated field they should be buried at least one
foot in the ground. If the landowner objects, a witness corner may be
set. Witness corners should also be set if the corner falls at an
inaccessible point (see Section 4–17 of the Manual of Surveying
Instructions). If the corner falls in a road, it is advisable to bury
the corner at the true point and set reference monuments at equal
distances on either side of the road (see Section 4–16 of the Manual of
Surveying Instructions).
Location posts, such as a 4×4 post in good condition, may be set
alongside the patent survey corners as a guard post and to aid in
calling attention to it.
In selecting corner numbers, there is no rule other than Cor. No. 1
should be the corner from which the tie is given to the section corner
or location monument. When surveying a block of claims common corners
should be given the same number thereby reducing the number of section
corner ties required from Cor. No. 1. This facilitates field note
writing as well as platting.
=5–5= Improvements: All improvements made by the claimant or his
grantors are to be tied to a corner of the survey, measured, and a value
placed thereon if they are such as to count toward the $500 patent
expenditure. If they are to count as patent expenditure, they must be in
the nature of actual mining improvements, such as cuts, tunnels, shafts,
drill holes, etc.; in other words, an improvement that tends to develop
or explore the mineral deposit.
Improvements such as cabins, ore bins, roads, bridges, etc., do not
develop the claim, but should be tied in, measured and included under
“OTHER IMPROVEMENTS” in the field notes, without a value.
Work done by third parties must also be tied-in and listed under “OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS.” If the claimant to such work is unknown, that fact should
be stated. Again, no value is to be placed on these improvements.
The value to be placed on small improvements can readily be ascertained
by multiplying the local wage or cost of equipment and operator by the
length of time required to do the work. Drill holes may be valued at the
cost of drilling, plus the cost of surveying, geologic evaluation and
assaying. Larger improvements may not be as easy to estimate, and it may
be necessary to go to the claimant’s cost records in order to place a
reasonable value on them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account