Communism -- Soviet Union; Goldman, Emma, 1869-1940; Soviet Union -- History -- Revolution, 1917-1921 -- Personal narratives, American
We carried a letter of introduction to a woman physician, the sister of
our Odessa Bundist friend. She was to direct us how to go about
procuring the provisions. Arriving at the Doctor’s house we found her
living in two small rooms, ill kept and unclean, with a dirty baby
crawling about. The woman was busy making apple jelly. She was of the
type of disillusioned intellectual now so frequently met in Russia. From
her conversation I learned that she and her husband, also a physician,
had been detailed to that desolate spot. They were completely isolated
from all intellectual life, having neither papers, books, nor
associates. Her husband would begin his rounds early in the morning and
return late at night, while she had to attend to her baby and household,
besides taking care of her own patients. She had only recently recovered
from typhus and it was hard for her to chop wood, carry water, wash and
cook and look after her sick. But what made their life unbearable was
the general antagonism to the intelligentsia. They had it constantly
thrown up to them that they were bourgeois and counter-revolutionists,
and they were charged with sabotage. It was only for the sake of her
child that she continued the sordid life, the woman said; “otherwise it
were better to be dead.”
A young woman, poorly clad, but clean and neat, came to the house and
was introduced as a school teacher. She at once got into conversation
with me. She was a Communist, she announced, who was “doing her own
thinking.” “Moscow may be autocratic,” she said, “but the authorities in
the towns and villages here beat Moscow. They do as they please.” The
provincial officials were flotsam washed ashore by the great storm. They
had no revolutionary past--they had known no suffering for their ideals.
They were just slaves in positions of power. If she had not been a
Communist herself, she would have been eliminated long ago, but she was
determined to make a fight against the abuses in her district. As to the
schools, they were doing as best they could under the circumstances, but
that was very little. They lacked everything. It was not so bad in the
summer, but in the winter the children had to stay home because the
class rooms were not heated. Was it true that Moscow was publishing
glowing accounts of the great reduction in illiteracy? Well, it was
certainly exaggerated. In her village the progress was very slow. She
had often wondered whether there was really much to so-called education.
Supposing the peasants should learn to read and write. Would that make
them better and kinder men? If so, why is there so much cruelty,
injustice, and strife in countries where people are not illiterate? The
Russian peasant cannot read or write, but he has an innate sense of
right and beauty. He can do wonderful things with his hands and he is no
more brutal than the rest of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account