Georgia -- Antiquities; Mounds -- Georgia; Ocmulgee National Monument (Ga.)
Their simple living was obtained with the aid of a few tools and weapons
of stone and wood. Being constantly on the move, they could erect no
very permanent dwellings; and a rough lean-to shelter was doubtless
their only protection from the elements. Hunting was the major activity
of the men; for, with fish from the streams, the game which they killed
made up the chief element of their diet. The women were not idle,
however; for in addition to preparing the food and caring for the
children, they spent many hours in gathering the nuts, roots, and
berries which made such a necessary and welcome supplement to their
daily fare. It is doubtful that the bow and arrow, which to us are
almost inseparable from our picture of the Indian, had yet been
invented; but the thrusting spear and the thrown javelin were very
effective at close range. At greater distances the hunter could bring
down his game with the dart propelled by a throwing stick. This
increased the effective length of his arm and imparted the resulting
greater thrust to the butt of the shaft.
Also missing in their equipment were the pottery cooking vessels of the
later Indians, which so simplified the preparation of foods by boiling
and thus added variety to the menu. Stone boiling, of course, could be
accomplished by means of heated rocks dropped into some suitable
container, such as a pit in the ground lined with a skin; but the method
was tedious and probably less used for that reason.
Organization for such a life was simple. Since they must move with the
game on which they depended, group size had to be limited; for large
bodies of people could not move easily from place to place. Moreover,
the population was not large, and there was plenty of room to spread
out. For all these reasons the hunting band was probably made up of a
few related families, numbering on the average perhaps 50 people who
habitually camped together. Leadership in such a small group would not
be a matter of too great importance; and the chief might be chosen for
skill in hunting or for an outstanding personality. Possibly he
inherited the office, but in any case his authority is not likely to
have been very great. The band doubtless accepted his choice of
campsite, his direction in the hunt, or arbitration in disputes; but in
doing so it was more likely to be out of respect for his ability than in
recognition of his official position.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account