On Being Negro in AmericaRedding, J. Saunders (Jay Saunders)
General
On Being Negro in America
Redding, J. Saunders (Jay Saunders)
African Americans -- Race identity; Redding, J. Saunders (Jay Saunders), 1906-1988; United States -- Race relations
The reasoning in them is very subtle, not to say metaphysical, and it
runs like this: History is an imperative creative force (from Hegel
again!) and man is its vassal. It is beyond the reach and the control of
conscience and also beyond direction and prophecy. It created slavery,
the southwestward migration, the Civil War, Ku-Kluxism. History does not
conform to man’s will; it compels conformity, and under this compulsion
man and his society and his institutions are shaped into what they are
and into what they become by categorical directives as potent as the
word of God. History is above moral judgment and history’s errors are
beyond redress. Man’s world is mechanistic.
This is not mere error; it, too, is symptomatic of a trauma all the more
dangerous because this concept of history is what most Southern whites
believe when they are being reasonable about the race question; when
they are writing books about it, or talking quietly in their living
rooms; or when they come together and “gladly agree to co-operate ... in
any _sound_ program aimed at the improvement of race relations.” This
reasoning, at once defensive and defiant, expresses itself in clichés,
which are the hardened arteries through which thought flows. “The white
South is _inexorably_ conditioned by cultural complexes.” “In both the
physical and cultural heritage of the South there are certain cumulative
and tragic handicaps that represent _overpowering_ factors in the
situation.” There are “legal and customary patterns of race relations in
the South, whose _strength and age_ we recognize.”[2] The idealism of
these people of good will is negated by the meanings of their own
phrases.
The pattern of reason these phrases express has been the most
influential factor in race relations for nearly a hundred years. And if
Hodding Carter, one of the young Southern liberals, is representative
(“The spirit [of which these stories are symbols] is harmless enough; a
little pathetic perhaps, and naïve and provincial. Let alone, it will,
of course, wear itself out some day. Not tomorrow or next year or the
next year. But some day.”[3]), it promises to remain so for another
century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account