On reading in relation to literatureHearn, Lafcadio
General
On reading in relation to literature
Hearn, Lafcadio
Books and reading; Literature
This does not mean that the authors of such books could have
preconceived the entire range and depth of that which they put into
their work. Great art works unconsciously without ever suspecting that
it is great; and the larger the genius of a writer, the less chance
there is of his ever knowing that he has genius; for his power is less
likely to be discovered by the public until long after he is dead.
The great things done in literature have not usually been done by men
who thought themselves great. Many thousand years ago some wanderer
in Arabia, looking at the stars of the night, and thinking about the
relation of man to the unseen powers that shaped the world, uttered all
his heart in certain verses that have been preserved to us in the Book
of Job. To him the sky was a solid vault; of that which might exist
beyond it, he never even dreamed. Since his time how vast has been the
expansion of our astronomical knowledge! We now know thirty millions of
suns, all of which are probably attended by planets, giving a probable
total of three hundred millions of other worlds within sight of our
astronomical instruments. Probably multitudes of these are inhabited by
intelligent life; it is even possible that within a few years more we
shall obtain proof positive of the existence of an older civilization
than our own upon the planet Mars. How vast a difference between our
conception of the universe and Job’s conception of it. Yet the poem of
that simple-minded Arab or Jew has not lost one particle of its beauty
and value because of this difference. Quite the contrary! With every
new astronomical discovery the words of Job take grander meanings to
us, simply because he was truly a great poet and spoke only the truth
that was in his heart thousands of years ago. Very anciently also
there was a Greek story-teller who wrote a little story about a boy
and girl in the country, called _Daphnis and Chloe_. It was a little
story, telling in the simplest language possible how that boy and
girl fell in love with each other, and did not know why, and all the
innocent things they said to each other, and how grown-up people kindly
laughed at them and taught them some of the simplest laws of life. What
a trifling subject, some might think. But that story, translated into
every language in the world, still reads like a new story to us; and
every time we re-read it, it appears still more beautiful, because it
teaches a few true and tender things about innocence and the feeling
of youth. It never can grow old, any more than the girl and boy whom
it describes. Or, to descend to later times, about three hundred years
ago a French priest conceived the idea of writing down the history
of a student who had been charmed by a wanton woman, and led by her
into many scenes of disgrace and pain. This little book, called _Manon
Lescaut_, describes for us the society of a vanished time, a time when
people wore swords and powdered their hair, a time when everything
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account