On the Architectural History of Chester CathedralRickman, Thomas
History
On the Architectural History of Chester Cathedral
Rickman, Thomas
Chester Cathedral
The succeeding architect appears not only to have carried up to the roof
the walls of the South Transept and the Nave, but to have pulled down a
part, if not all, of the Norman tower. From the great size of the piers,
however, and other circumstances, I think it probable that he did not
take the piers down to the foundation, but merely to the springing of the
arches, and then, taking away the shafts, cased the old piers with his
new work; and this will account for the Norman remains which are left
standing in the North Transept. {11b} Another circumstance which leads
me to suppose that the piers were not taken down to the floor is the
continuance of the stone screen, which is evidently of Decorated
workmanship.
And here, perhaps, will be the proper place to mention another and most
beautiful relic of that style. This is what is known as the Shrine of
St. Werburgh, which,—shorn of its battlements, and having the shafts of
the upper arches taken away,—is become the Throne of the Bishop; and
though sadly disfigured by many coats of paint is worthy of great
attention. Indeed it is one of the purest and richest small specimens I
know, exclusive of the extensive works already noticed.
This Perpendicular architect raised the _large windows_ of the North and
South Transept, {12} which, though different, are both beautiful of their
kind. From various small marks of similarity, I am induced to suppose
that at the time those works were carrying on, the present _Cloisters_
were all proceeded with. The general design of these is good, but the
execution is not quite equal to what appears of the exterior remains of
the Church itself; of the latter, though now divested of battlements and
pinnacles, and the tower so weather worn, that its design is with
difficulty traced, the ornaments of the cornice of the Nave and such of
the mouldings as are yet distinguishable show the work to have been very
well executed. Of the Cloisters, the whole internal walls, containing
the windows and groinings of the roof, appear to have been executed
within a short time of each other, though perhaps not quite altogether
so. The small arches on the west side most likely contained the
lavatories of the Monks, and as the exterior wall of the Cloister is on
every side much older than the interior, the different breadths and the
various arches still remaining in that outer wall, together with the
small arches already mentioned, cause a very great and valuable variety
of springings, and modifications of groining, of a much earlier date than
perhaps later Early English.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account