Parents and childrenMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
Parents and children
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Child rearing; Education -- Parent participation
Nor are the interests of the family limited to those of the nation.
As it is the part of the nation to maintain wider relations, to be in
touch with all the world, to be ever in advance in the great march of
human progress, so is this the attitude which is incumbent on each unit
of the nation, each family, as an integral part of the whole. Here is
the simple and natural realisation of the noble dream of _Fraternity_:
each individual attached to a family by ties of love where not of
blood; the families united in a federal bond to form the nation; the
nations confederate in love and emulous in virtue, and all, nations
and their families, playing their several parts as little children
about the feet and under the smile of the Almighty Father. Here is the
divine order which every family is called upon to fulfil; a little
leaven leaveneth the whole lump, and, therefore, it matters infinitely
that every family should realise the nature and the obligations of the
family bond. As water cannot rise above its source, neither can we live
at a higher level than that of the conception we form of our place
and use in life. Let us ask the question--has this, of regarding all
education and all civil and social relations from the standpoint of
the _family_, any practical outcome? So much so, that perhaps there is
hardly a problem of life for which it does not contain the solution.
For example:--What shall we teach our children? Is there one subject
that claims our attention more than another? Yes, there is a subject
or class of subjects which has an imperative _moral_ claim upon us. It
is the duty of the nation to maintain relations of brotherly kindness
with other nations; therefore, it is the duty of every family, as
an integral part of the nation, to be able to hold brotherly speech
with the families of other nations as opportunities arise; therefore,
to acquire the speech of neighbouring nations is not only to secure
an inlet of knowledge and a means of culture, but is a duty of that
higher morality (the morality of the family) which aims at universal
brotherhood; therefore, every family would do well to cultivate two
languages besides the mother tongue, even in the nursery.
Again; a fair young Englishwoman was staying with her mother at a
German _Kurhaus_. They were the only English people present, and
probably forgot that the Germans are better linguists than we.
The young lady sat through the long meals with her book, hardly
interrupting her reading to eat, and addressing no more than one or
two remarks to her mother, as--“I wonder what that mess is!” or, “How
much longer shall we have to sit with these tiresome people?” Had she
remembered that no family can live to itself, that she and her mother
represented England, _were_ England for that little German community,
she would have imitated the courteous greetings which the German ladies
bestowed on their neighbours.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account