Paris : $b or, the future of warLiddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Science
Paris : $b or, the future of war
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Military art and science; War
If, then, gas seems destined to replace the bullet and the shell,
so equally does the aeroplane appear likely to supersede the gun
as the means of projection――and, like gas, aircraft are a weapon
not exclusively military, but resting on a civil basis. Their
transformation from a civil to a military use is far simpler than
with any of the old-established arms. This fact has a vital bearing
on the present world situation, for the geographical situation of
the continental countries, France and Germany in particular, lends
itself to the expansion of air transport far better than that of
Great Britain, and thus in any race for air supremacy the former
obtain a “flying” start difficult to over-value. In the present stage
of aircraft development the central position of these continental
countries makes them the natural hub of Europe’s air routes. England,
in contrast, is thrown back into her mediæval position, before the
Age of Discovery led to the development of trans-ocean shipping――in
semi-isolation on _the edge_ of the continental transport system.
Though the aerial successors of Columbus have already linked the New
and Old Worlds, it must still be some time before trans-ocean flying
becomes a normal service. Then, and only then, will the axis of air
communications again be shifted to the British Isles, as was that of
sea transport by the original discovery of America.
As for the two great Pacific powers, the United States are in an
excellent position for the growth of a strong civil aviation, because
the vast breadth of North America places a premium on any new and
speedier form of transport, whereas Japan suffers, in greater degree,
the disadvantages of England’s insular and border situation, so that
her air development must perforce be an artificial military growth
instead of springing naturally from civil “roots.”
Moreover, these can only grow firmly and spread in an industrial
soil――in the mechanical future of war supremacy will go to the nation
with the greatest industrial resources.
But Americans would do well to remember that the Japanese military
leaders are disciples of Clausewitz, and that one of his axioms reads:
“A small state which is involved with a superior power, and foresees
that each year its position will become worse,” should, if it considers
war inevitable, “seize the time when the situation is furthest from the
worst,” and attack. It was on this principle that Japan declared war
on Russia, and _for the United States the next decade is the danger
period_.
ARE ARMIES AND NAVIES OBSOLETE?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account