The positions are given for the epoch of the A.G. catalogues, 1875.0. Two of the N.G.C. nebulae had been measured by Lorenz from photographs made at Heidelberg. A comparison of his measures with the present measures shows the same second of arc in declination and the same tenth of a second of time in right ascension. The agreement is perfect to the last units used in the present paper, but as the nebulae, N.G.C. 7619 and 7626, are situated near the center of the plate, they cannot serve as a test of the accuracy of those near the edge. In several cases comparisons could be made with positions from visual measures, as given in the _Strassburg Annals_, Vols. III and IV. Here the agreement is not so good. In one case, on the same night, positions of four objects were measured with reference to a certain star, which was, in turn, tied up to an A.G. star some distance away. The objects are given as N.G.C. 3550, 3552, 3554, and a nova which is designated as K₁₂. The photograph shows N.G.C. 3550 and 3554 properly placed with reference to the star, both in distance and in position-angle; there is nothing at all in the place given for N.G.C. 3552; K₁₂ is properly placed from the star, but is in the N.G.C. position for No. 3552. The position of the reference star is given as about 17″ too small in declination. K₁₂ is clearly N.G.C. 3552, and evidently the fourth object does not exist in the published position. As these objects were all in the same field of view in the telescope, one is at a loss to account for the discrepancy. A list of the comparisons is given in Table II. The descriptions indicate form, brightness, and size, and occasionally the location of a neighboring star. Wolf’s classification was used. It is, as he remarks, wholly empirical and probably without physical significance, yet it offers the best available system of filing away data, and will later be of great service when a significant order is established. One class was interpolated between g and h, and was designated g₀. Brightness was estimated in the order B, pB, pF, F, vF, eF, eeF, and eeeF. The range is from Herschel’s Class II down to the limit of the plates. For several of the fields diameters were estimated to the nearest 5″. Otherwise the size was given in the order L, pL, pS, cS, S, vS, eS. The classification given in Table III is illustrated in Plate III, copied from Wolf’s engraving in Band III, No. 5, of the _Publicationen des Astrophysikalischen Instituts Königstuhl-Heidelberg_. The most striking feature is the great predominance of the classes e and f. These two classes form a continuous sequence from the brightest in the list to the very limits of the plates, where they are but mere faint markings on the films. Eleven are clearly spirals, and the spindles are unexpectedly common. These results are typical.