Such data as these, of which many more might be quoted, surely warrant the question, how far are we justified in assuming the necessity for the rich proteid diet called for by the Voit standard? Voit, however, with many other physiologists would apparently object to any diminution of the daily 118 grams of proteid for the moderate worker, on the ground that an abundance of proteid in the food is a necessity for the maintenance of physical vigor and muscular activity. This view is certainly reinforced by the customs and habits of mankind; but we may well query whether our dietetic habits will bear criticism, and in the light of modern scientific inquiry we may even express doubt as to whether a rich proteid diet adds anything to our muscular energy or bodily strength. How far can our natural instinct be trusted in the choice of diet? We are all creatures of habit, and our palates are pleasantly excited by the rich animal foods with their high content of proteid, and we may well question whether our dietetic habits are not based more upon the dictates of our palates than upon scientific reasoning or true physiological needs. There is a prevalent opinion that to be well nourished the body must have a large excess of fat deposited throughout the tissues, and that all bodily ills and weaknesses are to be met and combated by increased intake of food. There is constant temptation to increase the daily ration, and there is almost universal belief in the efficacy of a rich and abundant diet to strengthen the body and to increase bodily and mental vigor. Is there any justification for these beliefs? None, apparently, other than that which comes from the customs of generations of high living.