Physiological economy in nutrition, with special reference to the minimal proteid requirement of the healthy man: an experimental study — John Shaqi
Physiological economy in nutrition, with special reference to the minimal proteid requirement of the healthy man: an experimental studyChittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Science
Physiological economy in nutrition, with special reference to the minimal proteid requirement of the healthy man: an experimental study
Chittenden, R. H. (Russell Henry)
Metabolism; Nutrition
It is self-evident that the smallest amount of food that will serve to
keep the body in a state of high efficiency is physiologically the most
economical, and hence the best adapted for the needs of the organism. Any
excess over and above what is really needed is not only uneconomical,
but may be directly injurious. This is especially true of the proteid
or albuminous foods. It is, however, quite proper to question whether
a brief experiment of a few days in which nitrogenous equilibrium is
perhaps established at the low level of 4 to 5 grams of nitrogen, the
equivalent of 25 to 35 grams of proteid, is to be accepted as fixing the
daily requirements of the healthy man, offsetting the customs or habits
of a lifetime. Voit himself, however, has clearly emphasized the general
principle that the smallest amount of proteid, with non-nitrogenous food
added, that will suffice to keep the body in a state of continual vigor
is the ideal diet. Proteid decomposition products are a constant menace
to the well-being of the body; any quantity of proteid or albuminous
food beyond the real requirements of the body may prove distinctly
injurious. We see the evil effects of uric acid in gout, but there are
many other nitrogenous waste products of proteid katabolism, which with
excess of proteid food are liable to be unduly conspicuous in the fluids
and tissues of the body, and may do more or less damage prior to their
excretion through the kidneys. Further, it requires no imagination
to understand the constant strain upon the liver and kidneys, to say
nothing of possible influence upon the central and peripheral parts of
the nervous system, by these nitrogenous waste products which the body
ordinarily gets rid of as speedily as possible. They are an ever present
evil, but why increase them unnecessarily? This question brings us back
to the starting-point. What is the minimal proteid requirement for the
healthy man, or rather, how far can we safely and advantageously diminish
our proteid intake below the commonly accepted standards?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account