Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
Periander here assumed the discourse, and said: It was the manner of
the ancient Grecians heretofore, O Cleodemus, to propound doubts to one
another; and it hath been told us, that the most famous and eminent
poets once met at the grave of Amphidamas in Chalcis. This Amphidamas
was a leading citizen, one that had perpetual wars with the Eretrians,
and at last lost his life in one of the battles fought for the
possession of the Lelantine plain. Now, because the writings of those
poets were composed in verse, and so made the argument more knotty and
the decision more difficult, and the great names of the antagonists,
Homer and Hesiod, whose excellence was so well known, made the umpires
timorous and shy to determine; they therefore betook themselves to
these sorts of questions, and Homer, says Lesches, propounded this
riddle:—
Tell me, O Muse, what never was
And never yet shall be.
Hesiod answered readily and extempore in this wise:—
When steeds with sounding hoof, to win
The prize, shall run amain;
And at the tomb of mighty Jove
Their chariots break in twain.
For this reply he was infinitely commended and won the tripod. Pray
tell me, quoth Cleodemus, what difference there is between these
riddles and those of Eumetis, which she frames and invents to recreate
herself with as much pleasure as other virgins make nets and girdles?
They may be fit to offer and puzzle women withal; but for men to beat
their brains to find out their mystery would be mighty ridiculous.
Eumetis looked like one that had a great mind to reply; but her modesty
would not permit her, for her face was filled with blushes. But Esop in
her vindication asked: Is it not much more ridiculous that all present
cannot resolve the riddle she propounded to us before supper? This was
as follows:—
A man I saw, who by his fire
Did set a piece of brass
Fast to a man, so that it seemed
To him it welded was.
Can you tell me, said he, how to construe this, and what the sense of
it may be? No, said Cleodemus, nor do I care to know what it means. And
yet, quoth Esop, no man understands this thing better and practises
it more judiciously and successfully than yourself. If you deny it, I
have my witnesses ready; for there are your cupping-glasses. Cleodemus
laughed outright; for of all the physicians in his time, none used
cupping-glasses like him, he being a person that by his frequent and
fortunate application thereof brought them first into request in the
world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account