Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus : $b and also, Ethical fragments of Hierocles, the celebrated commentator on the Golden Pythagoric Verses, preserved by the same author
Philosophy
Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus : $b and also, Ethical fragments of Hierocles, the celebrated commentator on the Golden Pythagoric Verses, preserved by the same author
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Political science -- Early works to 1800
For there is one virtue pertaining to the government, and to the life
of men. But no one should through indigence solicit the assistance
of others, when he is able to supply himself with what nature
requires. For though there is a general communion [in the city],
yet every one should so live as to be sufficient to himself; since
he who is sufficient to himself does not appear to require the aid
of any other person in his passage through life. If, therefore, it
is necessary to lead an active life, it is evident that a king,
though he should also assume other things, will, nevertheless, be
sufficient to himself. For he will have friends through his own
virtue; and in using these, he will not use them by any other virtue
than that by which he regulates his own life. For it is necessary
that he should follow a virtue of this kind, since he cannot procure
any thing which is more excellent. And God, indeed, not having
either ministers or servants[18], nor employing any mandate, and
neither crowning nor proclaiming those that are obedient to him, or
disgracing those that are disobedient, thus administers so great
an empire. But as it appears to me exhibiting himself to be most
worthy of imitation, he inserts in all things a vehement desire of
participating his nature. He is, however, good; and the communication
of goodness, and this, with the greatest facility, is his only work.
But those who imitate him[19], accomplish every thing in a better
manner through this imitation. And the imitation of him is to every
thing the source of sufficiency. For there is not one virtue which
makes things to be acceptable to God, and another which imitates
him; [but both these are effected by one and the same virtue].
And is not our terrestrial king in a similar manner sufficient to
himself? For assimilating himself to one, and that the most excellent
nature, he will beneficently endeavour to render all whom he governs
similar to himself. But such as offer violence to, and compel their
subjects, entirely[20] destroy in every individual of the community
a promptitude to imitate [that which is most excellent]. For without
benevolence, it is impossible there can be assimilation; since
benevolence especially destroys every thing of a terrific nature. It
is much to be wished, indeed, that human nature was not in want of
persuasion: for persuasion is the relic of human depravity, of which
this temporary animal [man] is not destitute. Persuasion, indeed, is
a thing proximate to necessity; since this first of itself performs
those things which fly from necessity. Such beings, however, as
spontaneously use what is beautiful and good, are not influenced by
the reverence of persuasion; for neither are they influenced by the
fear of necessity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account