Postal service -- United States -- Second-class matter
The House Committee on Postoffices and Postroads, where the
postoffice appropriation bill originates, took cognizance of
these statements by the President and by the Postmaster General,
and ordered a hearing on the matter, which was held early in the
session. The various publishers of the country, representing
not only the Periodical Publishers’ Association but many other
organizations of publishers of various classes of periodicals,
sent representatives to Washington, and there were full hearings
before the committee, extending through several days. The
publishers stated their side of the case and the committee took
the matter under advisement. The House committee reported out the
postoffice bill with no recommendation of any kind in it for an
increase in second-class postage; and no separate bill providing
for the increase was prepared, introduced or reported.
Then Mr. Blythe, under the subcaption of “Running Down the Nine-Cent
Myth,” says:
Some years previously the congress authorized what was known as
the Penrose-Overstreet Postal Commission, composed of members
of the postoffice committees of the Senate and House, of which
Senator Penrose was then the Senate chairman and the late Jesse
Overstreet the House chairman. This commission met in various
places, had long hearings and made a report and prepared a bill.
Before making its report or preparing its bill the commission
employed, at a cost of seventy-five thousand dollars, or
thereabouts, chartered accountants and business experts to make a
thorough examination into the business methods of the postoffice
department, its expenditures and its resources. The results of
the work of these examiners was incorporated in the report to
Congress by the Penrose-Overstreet commission. It is notable that
this commission _asked the late Postmaster General, Charles Emory
Smith, of Philadelphia, who was responsible for the statement
that it cost seven cents a pound to transport second-class mail
matter, where he got his figures, and he did not remember, nor
would he testify concerning them_.
At any rate, when the Penrose-Overstreet bill, providing for
the reorganization of the Postoffice Department and the placing
of that great institution on a business instead of a political
basis, was introduced in the Senate and the House, it contained
no recommendation for the increase in second-class postage,
_because the commission had been unable to find any figures of
cost of second-class transportation on which such an increase
could justifiably be demanded_, even after expert examination of
the books of the department by unprejudiced men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account