Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The governor’s reception of the committee was cordial, but his response
contained some remarkable charges; he laid the blame for the excesses
on lobbyists who knew how to manipulate the negroes, and laid the
corruption at the door of individuals and corporations who represented
the very best people; nor did he scruple to withhold names.
“The bill (the five million bond bill) went to the Senate. I walked
into the Senate chamber and saw nearly every prominent broker of the
city engaged in lobbying that bill through the Senate, and it was
only by exposing the fact that one of their emissaries had come into
this very chamber and laid upon the desk of my secretary an order for
$50,000 that I was able to defeat it. Mr. Conway, the mayor of your
city, came here and offered me any consideration to induce me to sign
this bill.”[263]
The visit of the delegates to the Senate on February 2 degenerated
into pure farce. A long and amusing debate as to whether they should
receive them or not took place before the delegates, as by some
misunderstanding they had crowded into the chamber before the Senators
had settled this momentous question. And Pinchback explained in
great detail that he had been obliged to admit them at once or they
“would go off with an additional excuse that we would not listen to
the representatives of the people.”[264] After the reading of the
resolutions the delegates were virtually asked to leave[265] and the
indignation of the Senators found wordy expression.[266] Though the
suggestion to return the resolutions as “disrespectful and insulting”
was not adopted, the latter were promptly tabled.
The attempt with the House on the same day met with no more success,
though preliminary arrangement for a ten-minute recess prevented any
such undignified parley as had occurred in the other body. But the
House took much the same attitude of offense toward the resolutions and
buried them in a special committee.[267]
Nominating conventions for the selection of candidates for State
officers were held in the month of September by both the Republican and
Democratic parties. A feature of both conventions was the appearance
of a large number of colored delegates. Inquiries were sent to the
Democratic State Central Committee as to the admission of colored
delegates and so the committee in the regular address to the people
took occasion to voice the party sentiment in the following language:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account