Science and poetryRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
History
Science and poetry
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
English poetry -- 20th century -- History and criticism; Poetry
To understand what an interest is we should picture the mind as a
system of very delicately poised balances, a system which so long as
we are in health is constantly growing. Every situation we come into
disturbs some of these balances to some degree. The ways in which they
swing back to a new equipoise are the impulses with which we respond
to the situation. And the chief balances in the system are our chief
interests.
Suppose that we carry a magnetic compass about in the neighbourhood
of powerful magnets. The needle waggles as we move and comes to rest
pointing in a new direction whenever we stand still in a new position.
Suppose that instead of a single compass we carry an arrangement of
many magnetic needles, large and small, swung so that they influence
one another, some able only to swing horizontally, others vertically,
others hung freely. As we move, the perturbations in this system will
be very complicated. But for every position in which we place it there
will be a final position of rest for all the needles into which they
will in the end settle down, a general poise for the whole system. But
even a slight displacement may set the whole assemblage of needles
busily readjusting themselves.
One further complication. Suppose that while all the needles influence
one another, some of them respond only to some of the outer magnets
among which the system is moving. The reader can easily draw a diagram
if his imagination needs a visual support.
The mind is not unlike such a system if we imagine it to be incredibly
complex. The needles are our interests, varying in their importance,
that is in the degree to which any movement they make involves
movement in the other needles. Each new disequilibrium, which a shift
of position, a fresh situation, entails, corresponds to a need; and
the wagglings which ensue as the system rearranges itself are our
responses, the impulses through which we seek to meet the need. Often
the new poise is not found until long after the original disturbance.
Thus states of strain can arise which last for years.
The child comes into the world as a comparatively simple arrangement.
Few things affect him, comparatively speaking, and his responses also
are few and simple, but he very quickly becomes more complicated. His
recurrent needs for food and for various attentions are constantly
setting all his needles swinging. Little by little separate needs
become departmentalized as it were, sub-systems are formed; hunger
causes one set of responses, the sight of his toys another, loud
noises yet another, and so on. But the sub-systems never become quite
independent. So he grows up, becoming susceptible to ever more numerous
and more delicate influences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account