Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888. — John Shaqi
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 648, June 2, 1888.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The boat which we illustrate recently made the run from the Thames to
Portsmouth, and, the weather being bad, was taken through the somewhat
intricate but more sheltered fairways and channels of what is known as the
"overland passage." Off Margate she managed to get on the ground--a result
by no means to be wondered at; and, as the sands here are very hard, she
smashed her propeller. After a time she was got off and beached, when a
new propeller was fitted. We mention this incident, as it is generally
supposed that these craft are of a very fragile description; "egg shell"
is the favorite term of comparison. One distinguished naval
officer--retired--has said he would never willingly go on board these
craft, for fear of putting his foot through the bottom; and there is a
very funny story extant about a sailor with a wooden leg. It would seem,
however, from the experience of No. 50, that steel vessels are of much
more robust constitution than is generally supposed, and, indeed, there is
ample testimony to the fact. We recently witnessed the efforts of a small
working party to get one of these vessels over a bank. She was pushed as
high up as the strength of the party would allow, and in this position her
fore part was over the bank for about a third of the length of the boat. A
tackle was then put on the bow, which was bowsed down until the boat could
be dragged straight ahead.
A few words may appropriately be added here as to torpedo boat policy
generally. Admiral Colomb, in the opening remarks of his excellent little
manual, "The Naval Year Book," refers to the torpedo boat question in the
following terms: "The fleet, the flotilla, the cruiser, and the harbor
attack and defense have each had (_i. e._, during the past year) their
share of attention, and developed exercise, and opinion has been advanced,
guided, or turned back by the observation of facts which these exercises
have brought out. While it cannot, perhaps, be said that the torpedo, as
torpedo, has much altered its position in naval estimation, it seems fair
to assume that the torpedo boat, as boat, has fallen in repute. In the
first, it has grown very much larger, and has, in point of fact, ceased to
be a boat. In part this may have come about because the _role_ which some
proposed for the torpedo boat, of being an entirely defensive weapon
confined to territorial localities, and operating only within a short
distance from its port, has never been generally accepted. Boats which
were never intended for voyages have been sent on voyages, and, being
found more or less unsuited for that kind of service, supposed
improvements have been made, so that they should be capable of executing
it. The 'harbor defense' instrument has become a 'sea attack' instrument,
and in some sense an unrecognized rival to the undoubted sea-going torpedo
vessels like the Archer, the Fearless, and the Rattlesnake."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account