Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement No. 822, October 3, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
Prof. Pfluger attributes this large amount of bad sight to
insufficient lighting of school rooms, badly printed books, etc. One
must agree with a certain writer, who says: "Schools are absolute
manufactories of the short sighted, a variety of the human race which
has been created within historic time, and which has enormously
increased in number during the present century." Granting that many
predisposing causes of defective vision cannot be eliminated from the
rules laid down by our city fathers in acquiring an education, it
would be well if the architects of school buildings would bear in mind
that light when admitted into class rooms should not fall directly
into the faces of children, but desks should be so arranged that the
light must be sufficiently strong and fall upon the desk from the left
hand side. My attention has repeatedly been called to the cross lights
in a school room. The light falling directly into the eyes contracts
the pupil which is already contracted by the action of the muscle of
accommodation in its effort to give a clearer picture to the brain.
This has a tendency to elongate the eyeball, and as a permanent result
we have near sightedness. Where the eyeball has an unnatural shortness
this same action manifests itself by headaches, chorea, nausea,
dyspepsia, and ultimately a prematurely breaking down of health. The
first symptom of failing sight is a hyper-secretion of tears, burning
of the eyelids, loss of eyelashes, and congestion either of the
eyelids or the eyeball proper.
The natural condition of aboriginal man is far sighted. His wild life,
his nomadic nature, his seeking for game, his watching for enemies,
his abstention from continued near work, have given him this
protection. Humboldt speaks of the wonderful distant vision of the
South American Indians; another traveler in Russia of the power of
vision one of his guides possessed, who could see the rings of Saturn.
My recent examinations among Indian children of both sexes also
confirm this. While the comparison is not quite admissible, yet the
recent investigations carried on by Lang and Barrett, who examined the
eyes of certain mammalia, found that the larger number were
hypermetropic or far sighted. With all the difficulties which
naturally surround such an examination they found that in fifty-two
eyes of rabbits, thirty-six were hypermetropic and astigmatic, eight
were hypermetropic only, five were myopic and astigmatic, and others
presented mixed astigmatism. In the eyes of the guinea pig about the
same proportion of hypermetropia existed. The eyes of five rats
examined gave the following result: Some were far sighted, others were
hypermetropic and astigmatic, one was slightly myopic and one had
mixed astigmatism. Of six cows, five were hypermetropic and astigmatic
and one was slightly myopic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account