Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Philosophy
Secret Diplomacy: How Far Can It Be Eliminated?
Reinsch, Paul S. (Paul Samuel)
Diplomacy; Europe -- Politics and government
Lord Rosebery realized perhaps more fully than most of the leaders of
English public life the complications adherent to what had already
become public knowledge at the time.
Meanwhile the government, in Parliament, confined itself to plain
denials whenever the matter of international undertakings and
obligations of a general nature was brought up. The denials could be
justified from the point of view that the situation as stated by the
uninformed questioner in Parliament, in each case did not exactly
correspond to the facts. But the impression created by such denials
that no serious obligations had been incurred was, as the result
showed, entirely misleading.
On March 8, 1911, Mr. Jowett asked in the House of Commons whether any
undertaking, promise or understanding had been given to France that
in certain eventualities British troops would be sent to coöperate
with the French army. The Undersecretary of State for Foreign Affairs
replied: “The answer is in the negative.” On December 6, 1911, the
Prime Minister said:
“As has been stated, there were no secret engagements with France
other than those that have now been published, and there are no
secret engagements with any foreign Government that entail upon
us any obligation to render military or naval assistance to any
other Power.”
Upon another occasion Mr. Yerburgh, M.P., inquired:
“May I ask whether or not we are to understand that the
Government arrived at no decision upon this particular question?
Is the right honorable gentleman not aware that this new
definition of the two-Power standard is a question of supreme
importance, and that in arriving at our standard of naval
strength previous Governments had regard to the power of the
fleets of other countries?”
The Prime Minister replied only:
“I think this question shows the inconvenience of dealing with
these matters by way of question and answer.”
In December, 1912, Lord Hugh Cecil made the following inquiry:
“There is a very general belief that this country is under an
obligation, not a treaty obligation, but an obligation arising
out of an assurance given by the Ministry in the course of
diplomatic negotiations, to send a very large armed force out of
this country to operate in Europe. That is the general belief. It
would be very presumptuous of any one who has not access to all
the facts in possession of the Government--”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account