Select works of Porphyry : $b Containing his four books on abstinence from animal food; his treatise on the Homeric cave of the nymphs; and his Auxiliaries to the perception of intelligible natures. With an appendix, explaining the allegory of the wandering of Ulysses — John Shaqi
Select works of Porphyry : $b Containing his four books on abstinence from animal food; his treatise on the Homeric cave of the nymphs; and his Auxiliaries to the perception of intelligible natures. With an appendix, explaining the allegory of the wandering of UlyssesPorphyry
Religion
Select works of Porphyry : $b Containing his four books on abstinence from animal food; his treatise on the Homeric cave of the nymphs; and his Auxiliaries to the perception of intelligible natures. With an appendix, explaining the allegory of the wandering of Ulysses
Porphyry
Mind and body -- Early works to 1800; Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Odysseus, King of Ithaca (Mythological character); Soul -- Early works to 1800; Vegetarianism -- Early works to 1800
26. But what would be the condition of a city, if all the citizens were
of this opinion, [viz. that they should abstain from destroying animals?]
For how would they repel their enemies, when they were attacked by them,
if they were careful in the extreme not to kill any one of them? In this
case, indeed, they must be immediately destroyed. And it would be too
prolix to narrate other difficulties and inconveniences, which would
necessarily take place. That it is not, however, impious to slay and feed
on animals, is evident from this, that Pythagoras himself, though those
prior to him permitted the athletæ to drink milk, and to eat cheese,
irrigated with water; but others, posterior to him, rejecting this diet,
fed them with dry figs; yet he, abrogating the ancient custom, allowed
them to feed on flesh, and found that such a diet greatly increased their
strength. Some also relate, that the Pythagoreans themselves did not
spare animals when they sacrificed to the gods. Such, therefore, are the
arguments of Clodius, Heraclides Ponticus, Hermachus the Epicurean, and
the Stoics and Peripatetics, [against abstinence from animal food]: among
which also are comprehended the arguments which were sent to us by you, O
Castricius. As, however, I intend to oppose these opinions, and those of
the multitude, I may reasonably premise what follows.
27. In the first place, therefore, it must be known that my discourse
does not bring with it an exhortation to every description of men. For
it is not directed to those who are occupied in sordid mechanical arts,
nor to those who are engaged in athletic exercises; neither to soldiers,
nor sailors, nor rhetoricians, nor to those who lead an active life. But
I write to the man who considers what he is, whence he came, and whither
he ought to tend, and who, in what pertains to nutriment, and other
necessary concerns, is different from those who propose to themselves
other kinds of life; for to none but such as these do I direct my
discourse. For, neither in this common life can there be one and the same
exhortation to the sleeper, who endeavours to obtain sleep through the
whole of life, and who, for this purpose, procures from all places things
of a soporiferous nature, as there is to him who is anxious to repel
sleep, and to dispose every thing about him to a vigilant condition. But
to the former it is necessary to recommend intoxication, surfeiting, and
satiety, and to exhort him to choose a dark house, and
A bed luxuriant, broad, and soft,—
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account