Great Britain -- History; Raleigh, Walter, Sir, 1552?-1618
In the meanwhile, the evil which, so Spenser had prophesied, only waited
Raleigh’s death breaks out in his absence, and Ireland is all aflame with
Tyrone’s rebellion. Raleigh is sent for. He will not accept the post of
Lord Deputy and go to put it down. Perhaps he does not expect fair play
as long as Essex is at home. Perhaps he knows too much of the ‘common
weal, or rather common woe,’ and thinks that what is crooked cannot be
made straight. Perhaps he is afraid to lose by absence his ground at
court. Would that he had gone, for Ireland’s sake and his own. However,
it must not be. Ormond is recalled, and Knollys shall be sent: but Essex
will have none but Sir George Carew; whom, Naunton says, he hates, and
wishes to oust from court. He and Elizabeth argue it out. He turns his
back on her, and she gives him—or does not give him, for one has found so
many of these racy anecdotes vanish on inspection into simple wind, that
one believes none of them—a box on the ear; which if she did, she did the
most wise, just, and practical thing which she could do with such a
puppy. He claps his hand—or does not—to his sword, ‘He would not have
taken it from Henry VIII.,’ and is turned out forthwith. In vain
Egerton, the Lord Keeper, tries to bring him to reason. He storms
insanely. Every one on earth is wrong but he: every one is conspiring
against him; he talks of ‘Solomon’s fool’ too. Had he read the Proverbs
a little more closely, he might have left the said fool alone, as being a
too painfully exact likeness of himself. It ends by his being worsted,
and Raleigh rising higher than ever. I cannot see why Raleigh should be
represented as henceforth becoming Essex’s ‘avowed enemy,’ save on the
ground that all good men are and ought to be the enemies of bad men, when
they see them about to do harm, and to ruin the country. Essex is one of
the many persons upon whom this age has lavished a quantity of
sentimentality, which suits oddly enough with its professions of
impartiality. But there is an impartiality which ends in utter
injustice; which by saying carelessly to every quarrel, ‘Both are right,
and both are wrong,’ leaves only the impression that all men are wrong,
and ends by being unjust to every one. So has Elizabeth and Essex’s
quarrel been treated. There was some evil in Essex; therefore Elizabeth
was a fool for liking him. There was some good in Essex; therefore
Elizabeth was cruel in punishing him. This is the sort of slipshod
dilemma by which Elizabeth is proved to be wrong, even while Essex is
confessed to be wrong too; while the patent facts of the case are, that
Elizabeth bore with him as long as she could, and a great deal longer
than any one else could. Why Raleigh should be accused of helping to
send Essex into Ireland, I do not know. Camden confesses (at the same
time that he gives a hint of the kind) that Essex would let no one go but
himself. And if this was his humour, one can hardly wonder at Cecil and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account