As we saw above, the child’s absorption in his new play-world is shown
by his imperious demand that others, as his mother, shall recognise his
new character. Pestalozzi’s little boy, aged three years and a half, was
one day playing at being butcher, when his mother called him by his
usual diminutive, ‘Jacobli’. He at once replied: “No, no; you should
call me butcher now”.[34] Here is a story to the same effect, sent me by
a mother. A little girl of four was playing ‘shops’ with her younger
sister. “The elder one was shopman at the time I came into her room and
kissed her. She broke out into piteous sobs, I could not understand why.
At last she sobbed out: ‘Mother, you never kiss the man in the shop’. I
had with my kiss quite spoilt her illusion.”
-----
Footnote 34:
De Guimp’s _Life of Pestalozzi_ (Engl. trans.), p. 41.
-----
The intensity of the realising power of imagination in play is seen too
in the stickling for fidelity to the original in all playful
reproduction, whether of scenes observed in everyday life or of what has
been narrated. The same little boy who showed his picture-books to dolly
was, we are told, when two years and eight months old, fond of imagining
that he was Priest, his grandmamma’s coachman. “He drives his toy horse
from the arm-chair as a carriage, getting down every minute to ‘let the
ladies out,’ or to ‘go shopping’. The make-believe extends to his
insisting on the reins being held while he gets down and so forth.” The
same thing shows itself in acting out stories. The full enjoyment of the
realisation depends on the faithful reproduction, on the suitable
outward embodiment of the distinct idea in the child’s mind.
The following anecdote bears another kind of testimony, a most winsome
kind, to the realising power of play. One day two sisters said to one
another: “Let us play being sisters”. This might well sound insane
enough to hasty ears; but is it not really eloquent? To me it suggests
that the girls felt they were not realising their sisterhood, enjoying
all the possible sweets of it, as they wanted to do—perhaps there had
been a quarrel and a supervening childish coldness. And they felt too
that the way to get this more vivid sense of what they were, or ought to
be, one to the other, was by playing the part, by acting a scene in
which they would come close to one another in warm sympathetic
fellowship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account