The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of childrenHow, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Science
The book of the child: An attempt to set down what is in the mind of children
How, F. D. (Frederick Douglas)
Child psychology
Examples can easily be found to show at how early an age a child may
be influenced for good or evil. “I have seen,” says a parent, “a baby
trained to habits of cleanliness in six weeks of life,” and it is
doubtless true that the difference between good and evil first of all
means to a child what is allowed or what is forbidden. But together
with this it must always be remembered that there is the sense of
safety and of love which, originally connected with “Mother,” is (in
the case of a religious parent) speedily carried onwards and upwards
to the love and care of GOD.
[Sidenote: Olive Schreiner.]
In this connection a passage in Olive Schreiner’s “Story of an
African Farm” can hardly be omitted. It runs thus: “The souls of
little children are marvellously delicate and tender things, and
keep for ever the shadow that first falls on them, and that is the
mother’s, or, at best, a woman’s. There never was a great man who
had not a great mother: it is hardly an exaggeration. The first six
years of our life make us: all that is added later is veneer. And yet
some say, if a woman can cook a dinner or dress herself well, she has
culture enough.”
All that has been so far written in this chapter on Children’s
Religion is of necessity vague and rather difficult. To arrive at
_facts_ is almost impossible. The best that can be done is to speak
of probabilities in the light of that faith which has been handed
down. The religion of children of less tender years presents fewer
difficulties, and to the consideration of this it is proposed now to
turn.
But while the difficulties are fewer, they do not altogether
disappear. It is often, for instance, extraordinarily difficult to
determine in the case of a child of six or seven years how far his
or her religion has even at that age become directly personal, or
whether GOD is not often a Being to whom access is only possible
through someone else.
[Sidenote: Religion of Rather Older Children.]
[Sidenote: A Child’s Faith.]
The evidence obtainable on this point is most contradictory. A mother
writes, “Children’s faith soon becomes a real thing between them
and their GOD. My little boy of five is perfectly delightful in the
fulness of his faith. Only to-night when I had gone up, as I always
do, to tell him a Bible story or sing some hymns before he went off
to sleep, he suddenly said, ‘Mother, don’t you wish Jesus was on
earth now?’ When I said, ‘Why do you wish it?’ he answered without
the least hesitation, ‘Because I should go to Him and ask Him to make
me good for always.’ And then, a little time afterwards, he suddenly
started up, when I thought he was asleep, and said, ‘Oh! mother,
wouldn’t it be _dreadful_ if we had not got a GOD!’”
[Sidenote: A Doubting Thomas.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account