The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
TURRET SHIPS OF THE BARNABY ERA.]
The _Victoria_ on completion became the flagship in the Mediterranean
of Admiral Sir George Tryon. In the course of evolutions off the
coast of Syria on June 22nd, 1893, she was rammed and sunk by the
_Camperdown_. The disaster, which cost the lives of the Admiral and
321 officers and men, teaches no useful lesson, saving the danger of
transverse bulkheads. Water-tight doors were shut too late. The sea
entered. The ship gradually turned over, then suddenly “turned turtle”
and capsized.
The mystery of her loss has never been fully explained. Admiral Tryon
gave an order for the fleet, then in two lines, to turn inboard sixteen
points, while at six cables apart. This manœuvre, with turning
circles as they were, was bound to create a collision. This was
pointed out to Admiral Tryon, who, however, took no notice of the
representations. It has since been assumed that he went suddenly mad.
A more reasonable explanation is that he intended the ships to “jockey
with their screws” (a manœuvre which he never employed as a rule),
and forgot to mention the fact, though details of evidence in the
court-martial hardly bear this out.
The exact signal as made was:--
“Second division alter course in succession sixteen points to
starboard, preserving the order of the Fleet.”
“First division alter course in succession sixteen points to port,
preserving the order of the Fleet.”
This signal was capable of more than one interpretation. Along one of
them each ship in the two squadrons might easily have rammed the other
in succession, according to some interpretations. Using screws, both
divisions might have closed in very closely but quite safely. Acting
other than simultaneously they might anyway have effected the manœuvre
without disaster. At eight cables (a distance which was suggested to
the Admiral an hour before) it might have been done quite safely. There
have been other explanations also.
In the Fleet at the time everything was believed, except the “blunder”
theory which has gone down to history. To this day that is accepted
with reservation. But the rest is mystery.
The _Camperdown_, in turning, crashed into the _Victoria_, striking
her forward, curiously enough directly on a bulkhead, just as the
_Vanguard_ was struck when she was rammed.
It was not expected that the _Victoria_ would be sunk. Had the
water-tight doors been closed during the manœuvre, instead of at the
last moment, she would probably have remained afloat. As things were,
it was impossible to close many at the time the order was given, but
her low-freeboard also played a part. The sea invaded the door on the
starboard side of the superstructure and thence got everywhere on that
side of the ship. It was that which threw her over and capsized her,
but the chance circumstance of the blow on the lateral bulkhead should
not be forgotten. The _Victoria_ was struck just on one of the points
where all the odds were against her being struck.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account