The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present dayJane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
History
The British battle fleet, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b its inception and growth throughout the centuries to the present day
Jane, Fred T. (Frederick Thomas)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Warships -- Great Britain -- History
Armour (iron)--Complete 11--8in. belt. Bulkheads 8--5in. Barbettes
10--8in. Battery 10--8in. Horse-power--7,520 = 14.5 knots.
Coal--620 tons = 2,680 miles at economical speed (nominal).
The _Téméraire_ was unique in the world’s navies in that two of her
25-ton guns were carried--one forward, one aft--on special Moncrieff
mountings, an adaption for naval purposes of the “disappearing gun,”
invented for forts of that era. The gun, loaded under cover, was raised
to fire by hydraulic mechanism, and then recoiled to the loading
position. The ship was otherwise essentially of the Reed box-battery
type; the other two 25-ton guns being in a central main-deck battery,
and capable of a good deal of ahead fire. The other big guns (18 tons)
were cut off from the 25-ton by an armoured bulkhead, and merely had
the ordinary broadside training.
Like the _Inflexible_, the _Téméraire_ had a heavy brig rig. Towards
the end of her active service career this was replaced by a military
rig; but all her active work was done as a brig. She was built at
Chatham Dockyard, engined by Humphrys, and completed for sea in 1877.
In 1882 she was at the bombardment of Alexandria, and there did more
execution than any other ship. Her subsequent career was uneventful,
and in her own way she was a “monstrosity” as much as the _Polyphemus_
was. She is generally understood to have been a “naval officers’ ideal”
ship, rather than the regular production of the Chief Constructor.
Whether this be true is, at least, doubtful. Certainly she may equally
well be regarded as the forlorn hope of those who looked to see the
general principles of the central battery system adapted to suit the
new ideas as to ironclads. French ideas[4] also had probably something
to do with her peculiar design.
The idea embodied in the _Inflexible_ was so pleasing to the
authorities of that period that she was duplicated in two smaller
vessels of the same type, the _Ajax_ and _Agamemnon_, though the
precise purpose for which these vessels were built is difficult to
fathom. They were in every way inferior to the _Inflexible_, and
mainly of interest as indicating the definite abandonment of the idea
of the masted battleship, and they were also the last ships to mount
muzzle-loading guns:--
Particulars of these ships were:--
Displacement--8,660 tons.
Length (between perpendiculars)--280ft.
Beam--66ft.
Draught (mean)--24ft.
Guns--Four 38-ton M.L., two 6-inch 81-cwt. B.L.
Horse-power--5,440.
Speed--13.25 knots.
These were followed by the _Colossus_ and _Edinburgh_, which were laid
down in 1879. In these ships the 12-inch breechloader was adopted,
and an attempt at what was then a very considerable speed was made.
An auxiliary armament made its first really definite appearance, five
6-inch guns being mounted on the superstructure.
Particulars of these ships were:--
Displacement--9,420 tons.
Length (between perpendiculars)--325ft.
Beam--68ft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account