The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition — John Shaqi
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
This conception of the campaign is practically identical with the
theory first put forth by Rogniat in his “Considérations de l’Art de la
Guerre,” and repeated in his “Réponse aux Notes critiques de Napoléon,”
in the form of a criticism of Napoleon’s operations. He maintains that
Napoleon should have aimed first at seizing the two points of Quatre
Bras and Sombreffe on the Nivelles-Namur road, over which the allied
armies communicated with each other.
“If, instead of six leagues, he had made eight or nine (and he had
time enough, inasmuch as the Sambre was crossed at two o’clock), in
pushing his left to Frasnes and his advance-guard to Quatre Bras,
the centre and right to Sombreffe, with the reserves at Fleurus, he
would have obtained the precious advantage he ought to have aimed at,
that of separating the two opposing armies, of retarding the union of
their corps, of taking a central position and of attacking them one
at a time. In fact, Quatre Bras and Sombreffe are on the high-road
from Namur to Brussels; master of these points, he could then have
opposed the junction of the English on one side, of the Prussians on
the other.”[16]
This view has also received the endorsement of Jomini,[17] who
evidently thinks that Napoleon must have entertained it.
“Napoleon perceived that their (the Prussian) army sought to assemble
between Namur and the causeway leading from Charleroi to Brussels, as
it was by this route that the English would come to their assistance:
now, under this supposition, the Emperor had but one wise course to
follow; the most simple glance at the map would sufficiently indicate
that it was essential to seize upon Sombreffe on the one side, and
the central point of Quatre Bras on the other. * * * Because, once
master of these two points, he was in position to act at will on
either of the opposing armies, and prevent their junction.”
To the same effect is the sketch of Napoleon’s plan put forth by his
advocate, the Prince de la Tour d’Auvergne in his “Waterloo”:
“The Sambre crossed, he (Napoleon) would seize the line of
communication of the Anglo-Dutch and Prussians. Two columns would be
charged to establish themselves, one at Quatre Bras, the other at
Sombreffe.
“The separation consummated, he would easily make an end of both
the Prussians and the Anglo-Dutch. For this would only be to renew
a manœuvre familiar to him, and which had so often given him the
victory.”[18]
Charras, one of the Emperor’s hostile critics, takes the same view of
his intentions:
“It requires only a glance at the map to indicate with certainty the
point which it was his intention to reach in dictating his order of
movement. * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account