The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 251 new series, May 1917) — John Shaqi
The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 251 new series, May 1917)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 251 new series, May 1917)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
At the period of Parliamentary history of which ‘Q’ is the lively
chronicler, the ceremony of choosing a Speaker and obtaining Royal Assent
to the choice was identical with that first used on the occasion of Sir
Job Charlton’s election to the Chair in the time of Charles II. The title
of Speaker was bestowed because he alone had the right to speak to or
address the King in the name and on behalf of the House of Commons. Of
this privilege he customarily availed himself at considerable length. On
being summoned to the presence of the Sovereign in the House of Lords
he, in servile terms, begged to be excused from undertaking the duties
of Speaker, ‘which,’ he protested, ‘require greater abilities than I can
pretend to own.’ The Lord Chancellor, by direction of the Sovereign,
assured the modest man that ‘having very attentively heard your discreet
and handsome discourse,’ the King would not consent to refusal of the
Chair. Thereupon the Speaker-designate launched forth into a fresh,
even more ornate, address, claiming ‘renewal of the ancient privileges
of Your most loyal and dutiful House of Commons.’ Whereto His Majesty,
speaking again by the mouth of the Lord Chancellor, remarked, not without
a sense of humour, that ‘he hath heard and well weighed your short and
eloquent oration and in the first place much approves that you have
introduced a shorter way of speaking on these occasions.’
Up to 1883 the Speaker’s salary was, as it is to-day, £5000 a year. In
addition to his salary he received fees amounting to £2000 or £3000 per
session. On his election he was presented with 2000 ounces of plate,
£1000 of equipment money, two hogsheads of claret, £100 per annum for
stationery, and a stately residence in convenient contiguity to the
House. These little extras made the post worth at least £8000 per annum.
In the present and recent Parliament an ancient tradition is kept up by a
member for the City of London seating himself on the Treasury Bench. Two
members are privileged to take their places there, but after his election
for the City Mr. Arthur Balfour left Sir Frederick Banbury in sole
possession of the place. To-day, by the strange derangement of party ties
consequent on the war, the ex-Prime Minister has permanently shifted his
quarters to the Treasury Bench under the leadership of a Radical Premier.
In the first third of the nineteenth century the City of London returned
four members, who not only sat on the Treasury Bench on the opening day
of the new Parliament, but arrayed themselves in scarlet gowns. Sir
Frederick Banbury stopped short of acquiring that distinction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account