The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
_Soc._ Very good. And now you are in a position to advise 91
with me about my friend Meno. He has been telling me,
Anytus, that he desires to attain that kind of wisdom and virtue
by which men order the state or the house, and honour their
parents, and know when to receive and when to send away
citizens and strangers, as a good man should. Now, to whom
should he go in order that he may learn this virtue? Does
not the previous argument imply clearly that we should send
him to those who profess and avouch that they are the common
teachers of all Hellas, and are ready to impart instruction
to any one who likes, at a fixed price?
_Any._ Whom do you mean, Socrates?
_Soc._ You surely know, do you not, Anytus, that these are
the people whom mankind call Sophists?
[Sidenote: Anytus inveighs against the corrupting influence of the
Sophists.]
_Any._ By Heracles, Socrates, forbear! I only hope that
no friend or kinsman or acquaintance of mine, whether citizen
or stranger, will ever be so mad as to allow himself to be corrupted
by them; for they are a manifest pest and corrupting
influence to those who have to do with them.
[Sidenote: Why surely they cannot really be corrupters? See what fortunes
they make, and what an excellent reputation many of them bear!]
_Soc._ What, Anytus? Of all the people who profess that
they know how to do men good, do you mean to say that
these are the only ones who not only do them no good, but
positively corrupt those who are entrusted to them, and in
return for this disservice have the face to demand money?
Indeed, I cannot believe you; for I know of a single man,
Protagoras, who made more out of his craft than the illustrious
Pheidias, who created such noble works, or any ten other
statuaries. How could that be? A mender of old shoes, or
patcher up of clothes, who made the shoes or clothes worse
than he received them, could not have remained thirty days
undetected, and would very soon have starved; whereas
during more than forty years, Protagoras was corrupting all
Hellas, and sending his disciples from him worse than he
received them, and he was never found out. For, if I am not
mistaken, he was about seventy years old at his death, forty
of which were spent in the practice of his profession; and
during all that time he had a good reputation, which to this
day he retains: and not only Protagoras, but many others are
well spoken of; some who lived before him, and others who
are still living. Now, when you say that they deceived and 92
corrupted the youth, are they to be supposed to have corrupted
them consciously or unconsciously? Can those who
were deemed by many to be the wisest men of Hellas have
been out of their minds?
[Sidenote: _The rage of Anytus at the Sophists._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account