The different modes of cultivating the pine-apple: From its first introduction into Europe to the late improvements of T.A. Knight, esq.Loudon, J. C. (John Claudius)
History
The different modes of cultivating the pine-apple: From its first introduction into Europe to the late improvements of T.A. Knight, esq.
Loudon, J. C. (John Claudius)
Pineapple
_General Management._ He recommends keeping a moist atmosphere in the
house, and giving abundance of air when the plants are in fruit. His
other directions relate to mere routine practices, and offer nothing
else worth quoting.
_Insects._ A moist atmosphere, he says, will keep down these. “It is
only poor plants,” he says, “which are not in a good state of health,
that are infested with insects. They are encouraged by the warmth and
dryness of the air of the stove, and the bad state of the plants; but
where cleanliness and moisture are attended to, there will never be any
worth notice.” P. 36.
_Fruit produced._ He fruits the Queen Pine in two years, at the usual
season; but does not state to what size the fruit attains.
SECT. V.
_Culture of the Pine Apple, by Adam Taylor, Gardener at Devizes, in
Wiltshire, 1769._
This author, who was gardener to J. Sutton, Esq. at New Park, professes
“to lay down a mode by which the Pine Apple may be produced in higher
perfection, with more ease and less expense than has been hitherto known
in this climate.” He offers his treatise with confidence, as not being
founded on hypothesis, but on some years’ experience; and it may be
depended on, as “it admits of the attestation of many persons whose
taste and judgment are unquestionable.”
“The present way,” he says, “of raising Pine Apples, is made so
chargeable by the erection of hot-houses, and the consumption of fuel,
that many, even of tolerable fortunes, have been deterred by the
consideration of it, from raising this desirable fruit. It is farther
attended with trouble, and much uncertainty; and the fruit itself rarely
answers the expense either in size, number, or quality. But by the
practice now recommended, these several inconveniences are sufficiently
obviated. There are very few, even of commercial gardeners, who are not
able to accumulate the necessary quantity of horse-dung, which is the
principal article for this valuable end. And by such application of it,
they shall not fail to find their hopes abundantly answered, and their
labour well repaid.” P. 3.
_Form of House._ He both rears and fruits them in a pit. This he forms
either of boards, or of brick-work three feet deep, and of any
convenient length and width; and on the walls or boards, which inclose
the tan, he places a frame two and a half feet deep in front, and four
feet high behind. The ends and front are of glass, and the latter is
formed into small sashes, which slide in a groove. The back is formed of
inch boards, and against these he places a powerful lining of dung.
The pit he fills with tan, or dung, as may be most convenient; dung, he
says, does as well as tan, and only requires a little more trouble,
which is amply repaid to the gardener by the value of the dung to the
garden, when no longer in active fermentation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account