The Early History of the Colonial Post-OfficeWoolley, Mary Emma
History
The Early History of the Colonial Post-Office
Woolley, Mary Emma
Postal service -- United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
The act was in force for three years,[30] and in 1695 (July 2d and 3d) a
bill was passed for continuing the act three years longer, “every
article,[31] rule and clause therein mentioned to remain in full force
and effect.”
[30] _Journal of Legislative Council_, I., pp. 79, 80.
[31] _Journal of the Assembly._
In 1699 (May 5) the act was again continued,[32] this time for two
years, the new bill stating that “the advantage which the inhabitants of
this province daily have, the mutual correspondence which they have with
their neighboring collonies and plantations and for the promoting of
trade and wealth of each other, encourage to the continuance of the
same.” In 1702[33] the act coming again before the Assembly and Council
was continued for four and one-half years from 1700; and in 1705[34]
(July 5, 6, 8 and 10, and August 14) it was re-continued for three years
from October, 1704.[35]
[32] _Journal of the Legislative Council_, I., pp. 136, 137, 138, 143.
[33] _Journal Legislative Council_, I., 186, 187, 189.
[34] _Journal of the Assembly_, pp. 154, 226, 227, 234.
[35] _Journal of the Assembly_, pp. 198, 200, 203.
Concerning the passage of this act Lord Cornbury wrote to the Lords of
Trade that it was absolutely necessary; otherwise the post to Boston and
Philadelphia would be lost.[36]
[36] _Colonial Documents of N. Y._, IV., pp. 1167-68.
At the meeting[37] of the first session of the eleventh Assembly at Fort
Anne, August 20, 1708, Governor Cornbury in his opening speech said:[38]
“I can’t omit putting you in mind that Act for encouraging a Post Office
is expired; that it is of so general Advantage that I hope you will
revive it.” The next month (September 3, 7, 10, 13, and 18, 1708) the
act was considered and passed. At a meeting of the council in New
York,[39] June 21, 1709, one of the members was ordered to go to the
assembly and “desire them to provide for and settle a Post from Albany
to Westfield for holding a Correspondence Between Boston and Albany for
the service of the present Expedition the Province of Massachusetts Bay
having already settled a Post from Boston to Westfield;” but action was
not taken before 1715.
[37] _Journal of the Council_, I., p. 247.
[38] _Journal of the Assembly_, 219, 223, 224.
[39] _Journal of the Legislative Council_, I., p. 285.
The letters of this period throw light upon the condition of the post
with regard to regularity and frequency.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account