The essentials of mysticism, and other essaysUnderhill, Evelyn
Religion
The essentials of mysticism, and other essays
Underhill, Evelyn
Mysticism
So we may say that the particular mental image which the mystic forms of
his objective, the traditional theology he accepts, is not essential.
Since it is never adequate, the degree of its inadequacy is of secondary
importance. Though some creeds have proved more helpful to the mystic
than others, he is found fully developed in every great religion. We
cannot honestly say that there is any wide difference between the
Brahman, Sūfi, or Christian mystic at their best. They are far more like
each other than they are like the average believer in their several
creeds. What is essential is the way the mystic feels about his Deity,
and about his own relation with it; for this adoring and all-possessing
consciousness of the rich and complete divine life over against the
self’s life, and of the possible achievement of a level of being, a
sublimation of the self, wherein we are perfectly united with it, may
fairly be written down as a necessary element of all mystical life. This
is the common factor which unites those apparently incompatible views of
the Universe which have been claimed at one time or another as mystical.
Their mystical quality abides wholly in the temper of the self who
adopts them. He may be a transcendentalist; but if so, it is because his
intuition of the divine is so lofty that it cannot be expressed by means
of any intellectual concept, and he is bound to say with Ruysbroeck, “He
is neither This nor That.” He may be a unanimist; but if he is, it is
because he finds in other men—more, in the whole web of life—that
mysterious living essence which is a mode of God’s existence, and which
he loves, seeks and recognizes everywhere. “How shall I find words for
the beauty of my Beloved? For He is merged in all beauty,” says Kabir,
“His colour is in all the pictures of the world, and it bewitches the
body and the mind.” He may be—often is—a sacramentalist; but if so, only
because the symbol or the sacrament help him to touch God. So St.
Thomas:
“Adoro te devote, latens Deitas,
Quæ sub his figuris vere latitas.”
The moment the mystic suspects that any of these things are obstacles
instead of means, he rejects them; to the scandal of those who
habitually confuse the image with the reality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account