The Etymology of Local Names: With a short introduction to the relationship of languages. Teutonic names. — John Shaqi
The Etymology of Local Names: With a short introduction to the relationship of languages. Teutonic names.Morris, Richard
History
The Etymology of Local Names: With a short introduction to the relationship of languages. Teutonic names.
Morris, Richard
English language -- Etymology -- Names; Names, Geographical -- England; Onomastics
The object of the following pages is to supply teachers with the chief
_root_ or _key_-words which are necessary for the explanation of local
names in England, and such kindred forms as are to be met with in those
countries occupied by nations belonging to the same family, and usually
termed Teutonic. It is a well-known fact that many of the names of places
in England are also common to Germany. Verstegan, in his scarce work,
printed in 1605, very plainly alludes to it. “Thus the Saxons,” he says,
“who at first came unto the aid of the Britons, became about two hundred
years after, to be the possessors and sharers of the best part of the
Isle of Britain among themselves. And, as their language was altogether
different from that of the Britons, so left they very few cities, towns,
villages, passages, rivers, woods, fields, hills, or dales that they gave
not new names unto, such as in their own language were intelligible, and
either given by reason of the situation or nature of the place, or after
some place in some sort like unto it in Germany, from whence they came—as
the name of Oxford or Oxenford, on the river Thames, after the town of
the same name in Germany, situated on the Oder; our Hereford, near unto
Wales, after Hervford, in Westphalia. And so, in like manner, may be said
of Stafford, Swinford, Bradford, Norden, Newark, Bentham, Oxenbridge,
Buchurst, Scorethorpe, Holt, Mansfield, Swinefield, Daventry, Hampstead,
Radcliff, Rosendale, and a great number of places in our country, that
yet retain the names of places in Germany and the Netherlands (albeit the
ancient orthography may in some of them be a little varied), as here to
be reckoned up would be tedious.”
We have chosen English names as the basis of comparison because they
are more familiar, and, indeed, of more importance than any others.
Emerson, speaking of them, says—“The names are excellent; an atmosphere
of legendary melody spreads over the land. Older than all epics and
histories, which clothe a nation, this under-shirt sits close to the
body. What history, too, and what stores of primitive and savage
observation, it unfolds!”
The names of places in England, and among the Teutonic tribes generally,
are composed of two parts. The first member is a _descriptive_ word
referring to some particular historical circumstance, to personages, to
animals, vegetables, or minerals; or it may be merely an adjective. The
second member designates, by some _general_ and appropriate term, either
the natural features of the country, settlement, or neighbourhood to be
described—as hill, mountain, river, &c.—or some artificial constructions,
as town, borough, field, &c. The first member is generally prefixed
to distinguish places having similar positions—_e.g._, Staple-ford,
Notting-ham, New-ark, &c. Sometimes the names of places are represented
by a single word—_e.g._, Slough, Ford, Holt, Down, Berg, Furt, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account