The evolution of worlds from nebulaeDean, Lee Parker
Science
The evolution of worlds from nebulae
Dean, Lee Parker
Nebular hypothesis
2nd. The little planets called asteroids take somewhat the form of
a nebula and are distant from the sun from two to three hundred and
fifteen millions of miles. Yet these planets, numbering some three
hundred, do not, if taken all together, form more than one-fourth
the size of Earth, yet they must be older than either Earth or Mars,
according to the above hypothesis, and should likewise be cold.
For a time the explosion of some planet was thought to have formed
them, but the great number since discovered, and their position and
movements, give no credence to the belief that they are fragments
of a shattered planet; for Vesta as seen by the naked eye, and
Ceres and Pallas, show by their orbits that to be an impossibility.
They are now thought to have been thrown from the sun as a ring,
and that the ring, instead of forming into one planet, has been
broken up into these numberless asteroids. If this supposition be
true we should expect to find them all at about the same distance
from the sun. Instead we find that their distances vary millions
of miles, making nearly as great a difference between them as is
their distance from the sun. What, then, must that ring have been
when it is claimed that the combined mass of the asteroids would not
exceed over 400 miles! Proctor tells us: “The asteroids themselves
supply an argument in favor of the nebular theory rendering its
probability so strong as practically to amount to certainty; for
the antecedent probability against the observed uniformity of
direction of the 175 asteroids by chance, or in any conceivable
way except as the result of some process of evolution is equal to
that of tossing either ‘head’ or ‘tail’ 175 times running, or about
23,945,290,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
to 1.”[9] Notwithstanding the above statement we would argue that when
those asteroids were formed the sun must have reached out to them,
if they were cast off from it; whereas we see them distant from the
sun only from two to three hundred million miles, while Jupiter is
480 millions of miles distant from it, so that to-day the asteroids
are about as far from one as the other. How could they thus get away
from the sun’s gravitation when it is still a thousand times larger
than Jupiter and at the time they were thrown off—or _detached_—must
have been much more than that. It is claimed that Jupiter has still
great power over these asteroids, and if so the sun should have a much
greater power because of its size and proximity.
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account