The foreign debt of English literatureTucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
History
The foreign debt of English literature
Tucker, T. G. (Thomas George)
Comparative literature; English literature -- History and criticism
One other kind of ancient poetry, and a delightful kind as we see it
in Greece, is the pastoral idyll of Theocritus, Bion, and Moschus. In
English literature the word “pastoral” at once suggests poor triviality,
the rather mawkish and always artificial eclogues of Pope or the
_Shepheard’s Calender_ of Spenser. But, though the conception of these
works was ultimately borrowed from Greek through the Latin medium of
Virgil, or the Italian medium of Sannazaro, they lack precisely those
elements which make the Greek pastoral idyll a thing of beauty and a
joy for ever. When Theocritus, about 270 B.C., wrote in Alexandria or
elsewhere his “Idylls” or (“little pictures”), he was portraying a life
among Sicilian or Coan shepherds which possessed a large proportion
of truth and naturalness. At least it is of real shepherds that he
writes, idealizing, perhaps, their Arcadian environment of sunshine and
simplicity, but nevertheless presenting a life easily conceivable among
entirely possible rustics. He imaged a rural scene, placed in it a
befitting action or situation, and called his work “a little picture.”
But when Virgil imitated him at Rome, the Corydons and Damoetases whom
he introduces are hardly shepherds of reality. Their talk tends to be
artificial and literary. Shepherds did not pipe and contend in alternate
minstrelsy on the Italian farms as Greek shepherds had done, however
rudely, in Cos or Sicily. Moreover Virgil wrote with an _arrière pensée_.
He was thinking of the society of his time, and more or less representing
that society under the guise of obviously theatrical shepherds. In
Spenser’s _Shepheard’s Calender_ we no longer recognize any pretence at
reality. The idea of merry witty shepherds piping in sylvan scenes of
sunlit Sicily is natural enough; but the notion of the smock-frocked
rustic of rainy Britain vying in song with another smock-frocked rustic
concerning his Amaryllis or his Chloe is not a little ludicrous.
Especially is this so when we know that Colin Clout, Cuddie, Hobbinol,
and the other swains, are talking moral wisdom, and are nothing but
Spenser’s friends or contemporary celebrities with shepherds’ crooks for
poetic “properties.”
Distinguished, however, from pastoral poetry pure and simple, as seen in
Pope and Spenser, there is a more important form of creation by these
Alexandrian poets, which finds its way into English literature. It is
from Theocritus and his school that Milton’s _Lycidas_ is drawn, and it
is from _Lycidas_ that we get Shelley’s _Adonais_ and Matthew Arnold’s
_Thyrsis_. Here are two quite unimportant passages, the comparison
of which will show at once how closely a great English poet may
occasionally copy an ancient. Says Theocritus, as translated by Calverley:
The voice of Thyrsis: Etna’s Thyrsis I.
Where were ye, Nymphs, oh where, while Daphnis pined?
In fair Peneus or in Pindus’ glens?
For great Anapus’ stream was not your haunt,
Nor Etna’s cliff, nor Acis’ sacred rill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account