France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
So, however, in this world of ours, which has both an
indestructible hope in the Future, and an indestructible tendency
to persevere as in the Past, must Innovation and Conservation
wage their perpetual conflict, as they may and can. Wherein the
“dæmonic element,” that lurks in all human things, _may_
doubtless, some once in the thousand years—get vent! But indeed
may we not regret that such conflict,—which, after all, is but
like that classical one of “hate-filled Amazons with heroic
Youths,” and will end in _embraces_,—should usually be so
spasmodic? For Conservation, strengthened by that mightiest
quality in us, our indolence, sits for long ages, not victorious
only, which she should be; but tyrannical, incommunicative. She
holds her adversary as if annihilated; such adversary lying, all
the while, like some buried Enceladus; who, to gain the smallest
freedom, must stir a whole Trinacria with it Ætnas.
Wherefore, on the whole, we will honour a Paper Age too; an Era
of hope! For in this same frightful process of Enceladus Revolt;
when the task, on which no mortal would willingly enter, has
become imperative, inevitable,—is it not even a kindness of
Nature that she lures us forward by cheerful promises, fallacious
or not; and a whole generation plunges into the Erebus Blackness,
lighted on by an Era of Hope? It has been well said: “Man is
based on Hope; he has properly no other possession but Hope; this
habitation of his is named the Place of Hope.”
Chapter 1.2.IV.
Maurepas.
But now, among French hopes, is not that of old M. de Maurepas
one of the best-grounded; who hopes that he, by dexterity, shall
contrive to continue Minister? Nimble old man, who for all
emergencies has his light jest; and ever in the worst confusion
will emerge, cork-like, unsunk! Small care to him is
Perfectibility, Progress of the Species, and _Astræa Redux:_ good
only, that a man of light wit, verging towards fourscore, can in
the seat of authority feel himself important among men. Shall we
call him, as haughty Châteauroux was wont of old, “_M. Faquinet_
(Diminutive of Scoundrel)”? In courtier dialect, he is now named
“the Nestor of France;” such governing Nestor as France has.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account