The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
This recognition of Sir Arthur’s merits, though princely, left him
ungrateful. On the 23rd August, 1603, he wrote Cecil pretending that
the King’s Letter had been “by the learned counsel found defective,”
and praying that “some other to better purpose may be signed by his
Majesty.” He did not disclose what was amiss with the Letter, or that
its only “defect” was that it did not authorise what he coveted. The
help of the vulnerable Viceroy was also enlisted, but to him the plea
put forward was that the Letter “was not so ample as his Majesty
intended.” Without awaiting Cecil’s reply Chichester stretched the
Letter by taking out two Patents, in each of which he inserted grants
greater than his Majesty had sanctioned.
In the first Patent, dealing with Belfast, issued on the 10th
September, 1603, he included the entire of the river Lagan, although
the fishing at the Castle alone was given him. The second, relating
to the Carrickfergus Governorship, he enlarged by a still more daring
addition. The original of either Patent is no longer available,
as they were first concealed, and then cancelled; but from those
substituted for them the conclusion is irresistible that they swept
the “command” of Lough Neagh into his hands. So glaring were their
excesses that Sir Arthur shrank from enrolling them lest a comparison
between their text and the King’s Letter, on which they purported to
be based, should shock inquiring minds. The King’s Letter then (as
now) lay in the custody of the Master of the Rolls.
Davies’ arrival in Dublin in November, 1603, proved a godsend to all
jobbers. The new Solicitor-General brought the latest London gossip
of the extravagant largesse of the Scotch King and Queen, and of the
Lord Lieutenant’s careless amours. This intelligence and his lawcraft
lent aid to Sir Arthur’s purposes and shaped his methods. The system
under which swollen grants were called into being for the profit of
needy favourites had already been set in full swing; and Davies knew
that the absentee Viceroy was not squeamish about the scope of the
Patents taken out by his brothers-in-arms. The Solicitor-General
framed himself to that situation. The entanglement with Lady Rich
made the Lord Lieutenant reluctant to return to Ireland, and the
delicacy of his position was becoming notorious. Davies saw its
weakness, and discerned in Chichester a kindred spirit and a rising
power.
Before long their interchanges resulted in a dashing expedient.
Underlying the application for the new Letter lurked the design to
make it cover a Patent bulking the “command” at Carrickfergus with
a right over Lough Neagh. If the scheme prospered, the concealed
Patents could afterwards be destroyed; and, as they were not
enrolled, legal proof of malpractice in framing them would also
disappear. This plan bore upon its face the stamp of Davies’ mint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account