French essays -- Translations into English; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence
One day you were having an affectionate conversation with Maurin. You
were delighted with one another, delighted to be together, satisfied
with your fellowship, your mutual possession. You were not talking
of anything very private. But then Blèche came up, Blèche with whom
you have such profitable, such intimate talks, and all the charm of
Maurin’s company disappeared without your being able to compensate
yourself with the usual pleasure you take in the society of Blèche.
This was because, in the presence of both, you could not give each one
what you are accustomed to give him, nor could you ask from him what he
gives only to you.
These combinations, like those of the chemists, demand much care and
judgment. Don’t protest! Don’t exclaim that such notions are too
subtle, too complex: you do not receive all your friends pell-mell.
However much of an epicure you may be, you still give more attention
to the selection of your guests than to the composition of the menu.
Of what importance is the most delicate fare in comparison with the
delight the conversation of carefully chosen human beings gives us?
That is why, when you are sure of two persons for whom you feel an
interest that borders on passion, you experience such a delicious
anxiety at the moment of presenting them to one another, of bringing
them together in your presence.
You are like the maker of fireworks who is about to mix changeable
substances with explosive properties in his mortar. You weigh them
carefully and combine them in well-defined proportions. You take time
preparing each of the spiritual elements of this mixture.
And when the union is accomplished, you seem to be saying to each of
them: “I have prepared a magnificent gift for you. Come, now, and know
one another.”
Your heart throbs, because each of them is not only going to know the
other but is going to learn to know you through the eyes of the other.
Could there be a better reason for living?
XI
However brief may be the intercourse we have with a man, we always come
away from it somewhat modified: we find we are a little greater than
we were before, or a little less great, better or worse, exalted or
diminished.
I have learned this from having, in the course of my life, approached
many men, both famous and obscure, who do not dream what I owe them or
the harm they have been able to do me.
We instinctively recognize and classify individuals according to this
faculty they have, some of drawing us out, others of crushing us. It
is a faculty they usually exert without knowing it, even against their
will: they are tonic or depressing just as one is short or tall, just
as one has black eyes or green. But the comparison breaks down in this
respect, that it is always possible to modify the reaction we produce
on others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account