Therefore, in the name of heaven, since, not content with certain
liberty, we are incurring the dubious risk of sovereignty and slavery,
let us adopt some method, whereby, without much loss, without much blood
of either nation, it may be decided which shall rule the other."--The
proposal is not displeasing to Tullus, though both from the natural bent
of his mind, as also from the hope of victory, he was rather inclined to
violence. After some consideration, a plan is adopted on both sides, for
which Fortune herself afforded the materials.
[Footnote 30: _Mettus_. Gronovius and Bekker read _Mettius_; Niebuhr
also prefers _Mettius_; he conceives that the Latin _prænomina_ and the
Roman _nomina_ terminated in _ius_.]
[Footnote 31: _Injurias et non redditas_, etc. The construction is, _et
ego videor audisse regem nostrum Cluilium (præ se ferre) injurias et non
redditas res ... nec dubito te ferre eadem præ te, Tulle_.]
24. It happened that there were in each of the two armies three
brothers[32] born at one birth, unequal neither in age nor strength.
That they were called Horatii and Curiatii is certain enough; nor is
there any circumstance of antiquity more celebrated; yet in a matter so
well ascertained, a doubt remains concerning their names, to which
nation the Horatii and to which the Curiatii belonged. Authors claim
them for both sides; yet I find more who call the Horatii Romans. My
inclination leads me to follow them. The kings confer with the three
brothers, that they should fight with their swords each in defence of
their respective country; (assuring them) that dominion would be on that
side on which victory should be. No objection is made; time and place
are agreed on. Before they engaged, a compact is entered into between
the Romans and Albans on these conditions, that the state whose
champions should come off victorious in that combat, should rule the
other state without further dispute. Different treaties are made on
different terms, but they are all concluded in the same general method.
We have heard that it was then concluded as follows, nor is there a more
ancient record of any treaty. A herald asked king Tullus thus, "Do you
command me, O king, to conclude a treaty with the pater patratus of the
Alban people?" After the king had given command, he said, "I demand
vervain of thee, O king." To which the king replied, "Take some that is
pure." The herald brought a pure blade of grass from the citadel; again
he asked the king thus, "Dost thou, O king, appoint me the royal
delegate of the Roman people, the Quirites? _including_ my vessels and
attendants?" The king answered, "That which may be done without
detriment to me and to the Roman people, the Quirites, I do." The herald
was M. Valerius, who appointed Sp. Fusius pater patratus, touching his
head and hair with the vervain. The pater patratus is appointed "ad
jusjurandum patrandum," that is, to ratify the treaty; and he goes
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account