The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered — John Shaqi
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, consideredPhilodemus
Religion
The improved antidote, supposed to be more active in expelling poison, than a late invention, by the Rev. Sir Harcourt Lees, Bart. in which the Catholics are vindicated from his abuse, and their claims for unrestricted emancipation, considered
willing to corrupt the members, and that even should any individuals of
the representative body betray their trust, the period will soon arrive,
in which they may elect more worthy representatives?—It has been asserted
that this is contrary to the nature of our boasted constitution; but, if
the system be imperfect in this one particular, why not amend so material
a defect?—Or is the constitution immutable but for the benefit of the
Aristocracy, whilst every change is inadmissible, that will protect the
people at large in the due enjoyment of their rights and privileges?—Is
the change from a Triennial, to a Septennial Parliament (brought about
by the representative body, in direct violation of their constituents’
rights;) is this change, it may be asked, less hazardous than one which
purposes only to guard against the corruption, and to correct those
abuses which have almost imperceptibly crept into the representation?—As
the existence of corruption in the representative is too probable, so
is its prevalence in the constituent body too notorious:—election by
ballot, it has been supposed, will provide a remedy against this evil;—it
will remain unknown to the candidates for whom the voters may poll, the
application of bribery therefore will be ineffectual, as, notwithstanding
his acceptance of a bribe, the voter may still poll, according to his
inclination or his conscience, without the fear of a discovery.
In regard to the universal suffrage, it must be acknowledged that every
individual, in the state, has an interest in the proper administration
of its affairs, and that Government will, sometimes, need the support,
even of its meanest subjects; if, therefore, they are interested in,
and contribute to the support of Government, they are entitled to
a participation in its privileges;—the privilege they claim is the
Elective Franchise, and as the lower house is called the Commons House of
Parliament, why should not the members, instead of representing property,
be in fact the representatives of the People?—At the same time such
material changes adopted on a sudden, might produce tumult and disorder,
they might occasion convulsions, attended with far more dreadful effects,
than the evils they purpose to remedy;—but when a minister acknowledges
corruption in his own conduct;—when the sale of Boroughs is notoriously
practised;—when, in some instances, the representatives of a County are
returned by the influence alone of a few powerful individuals;—when the
late convictions, in the House of Commons, for bribery, prove that it is
frequently, if not generally practised by the candidates for seats in
that house, and that it has a pernicious influence upon the constituent
body;—it cannot be disputed, but that some remedy ought instantly to be
applied, in order to eradicate, or at least to check the wide spreading
infection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account