The life of Cardinal Mezzofanti: With an introductory memoir of eminent linguists, ancient and modernRussell, Charles William
History
The life of Cardinal Mezzofanti: With an introductory memoir of eminent linguists, ancient and modern
Russell, Charles William
Linguists; Mezzofanti, Giuseppe, 1774-1849
From the death of Constantine, however, the study began rapidly to
decline, even among ecclesiastics. The disruption of the Empire naturally
tended to diminish the intercourse between East and West, and by
consequence the interchange of their languages. It would appear, too, as
if the barbarian conquerors adopted, in favour of their own languages,
the same policy which the Romans had pursued for Latin. Attila is said
to have passed a law prohibiting the use of the Latin language in his
newly conquered kingdom,[21] and to have taken pains, by importing native
teachers, to procure the substitution of Gothic in its stead. At all
events, in whatever way the change was brought about, a knowledge of
both Greek and Latin, which in the classic times of the Empire had been
the ordinary accomplishment of every educated man, became uncommon and
almost exceptional. Pope Gregory the Great, who, bitterly as he has been
assailed as an enemy of letters, must be confessed to have been the
most eminent Western scholar of his day, spoke Greek very imperfectly;
he complains that it was difficult, even at Constantinople, to find any
one who could translate Greek satisfactorily into Latin;[22] and a still
earlier instance is recorded, in which a pope, in other respects a man
of undoubted ability, was unable to translate the letter of the Greek
patriarch, much less to communicate with the Greek ambassadors, except
through an interpreter.[23]
More than one, indeed, of the early theological controversies was
embittered through the misunderstandings caused between the East and
West by mutual ignorance of each other’s language. Pelagius succeeded
in obtaining a favourable decision from the Council of Jerusalem in
415, chiefly because, while his Western adversary, Orosius, was unable
to speak Greek, the fathers of the Council were ignorant of Latin. The
protracted controversy on the Three Chapters owed much of its inveteracy
to the ignorance of the Westerns[24] of the original language of the
works whose orthodoxy was impugned; and it is well known that the
condemnation of the decree of the sixth council on the use of sacred
images issued by the fathers of Francfort, was based exclusively on a
strangely erroneous Latin translation of the acts of the council, through
which translation alone they were known in Germany and Gaul.[25]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account