The Lincoln Story Book: A Judicious Collection of the Best Stories and Anecdotes of the Great President, Many Appearing Here for the First Time in Book Form
History
The Lincoln Story Book: A Judicious Collection of the Best Stories and Anecdotes of the Great President, Many Appearing Here for the First Time in Book Form
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Anecdotes
As the statement about the slung-shot blow was made by a man who
disputed the ox-yoke accident, and that the fatal hurts were received
in the free fight at the camp-meeting, it was necessary that he should
be explicit. He had seen the blow and distinguished the weapon by the
light of the moon.
Lincoln was accustomed from early life to relieve his brain when
toiling or distressed, by the turning to a vein utterly opposed to
those moods. His chief diversion from Blackstone and the statutes was
his favorite author, Shakespeare. Hackett, the _Falstaff_ delighted in
by our grandfathers, pronounced the President a better student of that
dramatist than he expected to meet.
As the ancients drew fates, as it is called, from Virgil, and the
medievals from the Bible, so the lawyer drew hints from his author. The
process is to open at a page and read as a forecast the first line
meeting the eye. The play-book opened at "Midsummer Night's Dream." To
refresh himself after his speeches in rehearsal, Lincoln had been
enjoying the humor of the amateur-actor clowns. So the line "leaping
into sight" was on parallel lines with his thought.
"Does the moon shine that night?" So the text. Whereupon, _Nick
Bottom_, a weaver, cries out: "A calendar! look in the almanack! find
out moonshine!"
The pleader had his cue!
It was not necessary to postpone the trial on the ground that the
debate upon the new charge prevented a fair jury in the district.
Besides, the widow would grow mad in the long suspense, even if the
prisoner bore it manfully, though sorrowing for her and his misspent
life. The trial was indeed the event of the year at the courthouse. The
witnesses for the prosecution repeated about Armstrong much the same
story as had convicted Norris: Armstrong had led a reprehensible
career, and the deliberate onslaught with a weapon after the fight
could hardly have been made by an intoxicated man. It was
vindictiveness from being worsted by the unhappy Metzgar in a fair
fight. In vain was it cited that he and Metzgar had been friends and
that the accuser was a personal enemy of the former.
The case looked so formidable--unanswerable, in short--that the State
proctor's plea for condemnation might all but be taken for granted.
However highly the prisoner had been elated by his father's friend, his
own, having promised to deliver him before sundown, he must have lost
the lift-up. For he wore the abandoned expression of one forsaken by
his own hopes as by his friends. Norris, in his cell, could have not
been more veritably the picture of despair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account