The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
“Having, at your own urgent request [Mark that well! and what follows
also. This paragraph shows that Halleck himself was the instigator
of the charges against Porter], and from a sense of duty [!] laid
before the Government, the conduct of McClellan, Porter and Griffin,
and substantiated the facts stated by their own written documents, I
am not disposed to push the matter further, unless the silence of the
Government [this means Halleck, as has been shown Halleck was the only
objector to the gratification of Pope’s wishes], in the midst of the
unscrupulous slander and misrepresentation purposely put in circulation
against me and the restoration of these officers, without trial, to
their commands, coupled with my banishment to a distant and unimportant
department, render it necessary as an act of justice to myself.”
How keenly Pope feels his disgrace, having been used as a tool and then
flung aside, is shown clearly. He continues:
“As I have already said, I challenge and seek examination of my
campaign in Virginia in all its details, and unless the Government by
some high mark of public confidence, such as they have given to me in
private, relieves me from the atrocious injury done to my character as
a soldier ... justice to myself and to all connected with me demands
that I should urge the court of inquiry.... This investigation, under
the circumstances above stated, I shall assuredly urge in every way. If
it cannot be accomplished by military courts, it will undoubtedly be
the subject of the inquiry in Congress.”
Then follows a darkly ominous hint: “It is especially hard, in view of
my relations with you [Note that!] that I should be compelled even to
ask at your hands the justice which it is your duty to assure to every
officer of the army.... I tell you frankly that by the time Congress
meets such influences as can not be resisted will be brought to bear on
this subject.... I prefer greatly that you should do me this justice of
your own accord.”[14]
Altogether this letter is a rare specimen of the chiaroscuro in the art
epistolary; it tells of Halleck’s acts of injustice which Pope will
right by every means in his power. At times it breathes hatred and
vengeance, and closes with such a loving assurance as this:
“I write you this letter with mixed feelings. Personal friendship and
interest in your welfare, I think, predominate. I am not so blinded as
not to know that it gave you pain to allow such scandal against me and
to take such action as you thought the peculiar circumstances required.
Much as I differ with you on the subject, I am not ready to blame you
or to feel bitterly.”
Then follows that warning: “I impress upon you the necessity for your
own sake of considering carefully the suggestions I have presented,”
and closes with the assurance, “I shall not again address you a letter
on such a subject.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account