The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905Various
History
The magazine of history with notes and queries, Vol. II, No. 4, October 1905
Various
History -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals
This assurance was not fulfilled. Indeed, Pope wrote several letters
on the subject, as will appear. Queer letters were they, to be written
by a major-general commanding a department, to his superior, the
general-in-chief, to whom he administers the medicine _à la cheval de
trait_.
To summarize: Pope makes these charges against Halleck.
(1) That the plan of campaign was Halleck’s.[15]
(2) That Pope was but an instrument in the hands of the
general-in-chief.[16]
(3) That Pope faithfully executed Halleck’s plans.[17]
(4) That the latter fully approved every act of the former, thereby
making himself responsible, so far as Pope was concerned, for the final
result.[18]
Here a pause. These charges are fully substantiated by letters and
telegrams passing between Halleck and Pope, which appear in parts II
and III, of Vol. XII, of the Official Records. Pope was regularly
advising Halleck of his movements, and Halleck was as regularly
approving the same. And as late as August 26, 11:45 A. M., Halleck
wired Pope: “Not the slightest dissatisfaction has been felt in regard
to your operations on the Rappahannock,” etc.
Returning to the charges:
(5) That Pope had made the charges against Generals McClellan, Porter
and Griffin “at Halleck’s own urgent request.”[19] Halleck was the real
instigator.
(6) That Halleck had not assigned him [Pope] to command of the western
department, which, as Pope says, “would at once have freed me [Pope]
from the odium and abuse which have so shamefully and unjustly been
heaped upon me by the papers and people,” etc.[20]
(7) That he found himself banished to the frontier.[21]
(8) That his character and reputation as a soldier had been deeply and
irretrievably injured.[22]
(9) That the Government refused to allow him to publish the facts[23]
and
(10) That General-in-Chief Halleck declined to acknowledge his services
publicly.
All through the letters are insinuations and charges against McClellan,
Porter and Griffin. And he makes categorical demand in these words:
“I said, and say now, that one of three things I was entitled to; any
one of them would have satisfied me. The dictates of the commonest
justice gave me the right to expect one of them at least:
1st. That the court of inquiry be at once held and the blame be fixed
where it belongs. It is now too late for that, as the delay has already
made the worst impression against me that is possible.
2d. That the Government should acknowledge publicly, as it had done
privately, my services in Virginia, or
3d. That in case neither of these things could be done, then that
the Government bestow upon me some mark of public confidence, as its
opinion of my ability warranted.
None of these things have been done,” etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account