Cramp, Charles Henry, 1828-1913; Naval architects -- United States -- Biography
In addition to this necessity for the immediate improvisation of a
blockading fleet, the question of armored vessels presented itself,
because, besides the blockade, bombardment of sea-coast fortifications
which had been seized by the Confederates must be an essential part of
the general plan of operations.
[Illustration: CRUISERS BALTIMORE AND PHILADELPHIA]
The idea of armored ships was then entirely novel. In 1861 only two
efforts had been made, one by England and the other by France, to
construct an _armored sea-going vessel_. To meet this necessity of
having ships capable of attacking heavily armed forts, Congress passed
an act, approved August 3, 1861, authorizing the construction of armored
vessels. This act authorized and directed the Secretary to appoint a
board of skilled naval officers to investigate plans and specifications
that might be submitted for the construction of iron- or steel-clad
steamships or steam floating batteries; and, on their favorable report,
authorizing the Secretary to cause one or more armored or iron- or
steel-clad steamships to be built, making an appropriation of $1,500,000
to carry the act into effect. Pursuant to this act, the Secretary
appointed on August 8 a board consisting of Commodore Joseph Smith,
Commodore Hiram Paulding, and Commander Charles Davis, to examine such
plans as might be submitted, and issued an advertisement, under date of
August 7, calling for plans and prices. The advertisement stated that a
general description and drawings of the vessels’ armor and machinery,
sufficient to indicate the character and probable efficiency of the
vessel, would be required; also that the offer must state the cost and
time for completing, exclusive of armament and stores, the rate of speed
proposed, etc. Persons proposing to make offers under this advertisement
were required to inform the Department of their intention before the
15th of August, and to have their propositions presented within
twenty-five days from the date of the advertisement.
On September 16, 1861, the board reported that seventeen offers had been
laid before them. All but three, however, were ruled out, mainly on
account of insufficiency of data or lack of drawings. Several of them
were, in fact, mere suggestions.
The three selected were: First, one to be built of wood and plated with
four inches of iron; to be a full-rigged ship of about three thousand
three hundred tons displacement; price, $780,000; length of the vessel,
two hundred and twenty feet; breadth of beam, sixty feet; depth of hold,
twenty-three feet; contract time, nine months; draught of water,
thirteen feet; speed, nine and one-half knots.
The second, offered by C. S. Bushnell & Co., of New Haven, was of the
low freeboard monitor type, the invention of which is commonly ascribed
to John Ericsson; and the third, offered by same parties, which was
afterward known as the “Galena.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account