The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
It is important to bear in mind that both in East and West Africa and
in the Canary Islands the technical procedures in the practice of
mummification are those which were not adopted in Egypt until the time
of the XXIst Dynasty. I have already called attention to this fact in
my references to the Torres Straits mummies (_vide supra_), and to the
inference that these extensive migrations of Egyptian influence could not
have begun before the ninth century B.C.
(For more complete bibliographical references, see Pettigrew, (=56=), p.
233.)
The large series of identical procedures makes it absolutely certain that
the method of embalming practised in the Canary Islands was derived from
Egypt, and not earlier than 900 B.C.
Reutter states (=63=, p. 137) that “the Carthaginians, as the result
of long-continued commercial intercourse with Egypt, assimilated its
civilization even to the extent of worshipping certain of the Egyptian
gods and of accepting many of her ideas and beliefs as to a future life.”
“These reasons impelled them to practise the art of embalming and to
represent the features of the dead upon their sarcophagi to enable the
soul to refind its double.”
“Their burial chambers, for the most part not built up, but carved out of
the rock, communicated with the exterior by a staircase. Above them were
built mastabas or monuments to be utilised, as amongst the Egyptians, as
offering-places” (p. 138).
“Even the inscriptions in the mortuary chambers were written in
hieroglyphics, and their sarcophagi contained scarabs inscribed with
invocations to the Egyptian gods, Ptah, Bes and Ra, &c.”
This reference is sufficient to indicate how the later (certainly not
earlier than 900 B.C. and probably some centuries later) Egyptian
practices spread around the Mediterranean.
I do not propose (in the present communication) to discuss the influence
and the manner of spread of the practice of mummification in Europe.
Reutter gives certain information in reference to this subject. It will
suffice to say that there is no evidence to show that mummification was
widely adopted until comparatively late times (New Empire and later)
in the Mediterranean area, although certain effects of the Egyptian
practice, such for example as “extended burial,” spread abroad many
centuries earlier, appearing in most regions during the Eneolithic phase.
The procedures revealed in the Canary Islands bear no trace of the
influence of Negro Africa to which I have called attention (_supra_) in
the Soudan, Uganda, the Congo and the Niger. The details of the technique
suggests the method employed in the XXIst Dynasty; and other features
seem to point to the conclusion that the practice must have reached the
Canary Islands from the Western Mediterranean through the Straits of
Gibraltar, not improbably through Phœnician channels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account