The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs — John Shaqi
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
[For a full critical discussion of all the literature relating to
Egyptian influence in West Africa see Dahse, “Ein zweites Goldland
Salomos,” _Zeitsch. f. Ethn._, 1911, p. 1. The mass of evidence collected
in this memoir is entirely corroborative of the conclusions at which I
have arrived from the study of mummification.]
With reference to Babylonia Langdon (=32=) states:—“Traces of embalming
have not been found, but Herodotus says that the Babylonians preserved in
honey. But a text has been discovered which mentions embalming with cedar
oil (cited by Meissner, _Wiener Zeitsch. f. Kunde des Morgenlandes_, xii,
1898, p. 61). At any rate embalming is not characteristic of Babylonian
burials and the custom may be due to Egyptian influence.”
There can, I think, be no doubt whatever as to the Egyptian origin of
these instances of embalming in Babylonia. The mere fact of its sporadic
occurrence in a country of which it is not characteristic clearly points
to this conclusion, which is confirmed by the emphasis laid upon the
use of oil of cedar—a definite indication of the Egyptian practice.
The reference of Herodotus to the use of honey in Babylonia is also of
peculiar interest, for it provides us with a connecting link between the
Mediterranean area and India and Burma.
The extensive use of honey for the preservation of the body among the
Greeks, Romans, Jews, and possibly also the Egyptians, is indicated by
the frequent references to the practice in the classics, which have been
summarised, with numerous quotations, by Pettigrew (=56=, pp. 85-87).
The employment of honey suggests the spread of Egyptian influence to
Babylonia _viâ_ the Mediterranean and Syria, seeing that, so far as is
known, such a method was used only on the Mediterranean littoral of
Egypt, in Phœnicia and the Ægean.
Concerning the use of wax in the process of embalming, of which ancient
Egyptian mummies, especially of the new Empire (=86=), afford numerous
instances, Pettigrew (p. 87) remarks:—“The body of King Agesilaus was
enveloped in wax and thus conveyed to Lacedæmon. This is confirmed by
Cornelius Nepos, and also by Plutarch, who ascribe the adoption of wax to
the want of honey for this purpose. Cicero reports the use of it by the
Persians.”
In his account of the methods employed by the Scythians (living north
of Thrace) for mummifying their kings, Herodotus tells us that the body
was coated with wax, the abdomen opened, cleaned out and then filled
with pounded stems, with perfumes, aniseed and wild celery seed and then
stitched up. The important bearing of the practices described in the
Black Sea littoral upon Indian and Burmese customs (_vide infra_) I must
reserve for discussion at some later time.
It will be seen in the subsequent account that honey was in use for
embalming in modern times in Burma.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account