The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
But we have not yet exhausted the valuable evidence of _Domesday_. The
land in the Forest district is rented at much less than in other parts
of Hampshire, showing that it was therefore poorer, and not only the
land, but the mills. Further—and this is of great importance, as so
thoroughly overthrowing the common account—we find in that portion of
the survey which comes under the title, “In Novâ Forestâ et circa eam,”
only two churches mentioned, one at Milford, and another at
Brockenhurst, in the very heart of the Forest. Both stand to this hour,
and prove plainly by their Norman work that William allowed them to
remain.
Such is the evidence which _The Chronicle_ and the short examination of
_Domesday_ yield. The country itself, however, still more plainly proves
the bias of the Chroniclers. The slightest acquaintance with geology
will show that the Forest was never fertile, as it must have been to
have maintained the population which filled so many churches.[28] Nearly
the whole of it is covered with sand, or capped with a thick bed of
drift, with a surface-soil only a few inches deep, capable of naturally
bearing little, except in a few places, besides heath and furze. On a
geological map we can pretty accurately trace the limits of the Forest
by the formation. Of course, in so large a space, there will be some
spots, and some valleys, where the streams have left a richer glebe and
a deeper tilth.[29]
But the Chroniclers, by their very exaggeration, have defeated their own
purpose. There is in their narration an inconsistency, which, as we
dwell upon it, becomes more apparent. We would simply ask, where are the
ruins of any of the thirty or fifty churches, and the towns of the
people who filled them? Why, too, did not the Chroniclers mention them
specifically? Why, further, if William pulled down all the churches, are
the only two, at Brockenhurst and Milford, recorded in _Domesday_,[30]
still standing with their contemporary workmanship? Why, too, is Fawley
church, with its Norman doorway, and pillars, and arches, formerly, as
we know from another portion of _Domesday_, in the Forest, remaining, if
all were destroyed? And why, last of all, if the inhabitants were
exterminated, was a church built at Boldre, in the very wildest part of
the Forest, immediately after the afforestation, and another at
Hordle?[31]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account