The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Neither is he to salute his Rabbi, nor to return his salutation in the
same manner that salutations are given or returned amongst friends. On
the contrary, _he is to bow down before the Rabbi, and to say to him,
with reverence and honour, Peace be unto thee, Rabbi_.” The Rabbinical
Jews, who see this, must not mistake us. We do not consider it in
anywise sinful, but decorous, to treat a Rabbi with all due respect. We
should feel no objection ourselves to make a bow to a Rabbi, and to
salute him in the prescribed formula. But we cite these laws to show
that the New Testament gives a fair representation of the Pharisees: for
men, who could gravely sit down and enter into all these details of the
mode in which they were to be honoured, and then give out these laws as
divine, and, besides all this, call in the civil power to enforce them,
must have had no mean idea of themselves and their own dignity. It must
never be forgotten that these laws are not the mere regulations of a
religious community. When the Rabbies had the power in their own hands,
they enforced them by civil sanctions. They were not satisfied with
excluding despisers of Rabbinical authority from eternal life, _they
prosecuted such before the tribunals, and sentenced them to a pecuniary
fine and excommunication_, as may be seen from the following law:—
וכל המבזה את החכמימ אין לו חלק לעולם הבא והרי הוא בכלל כי דבר יהוה בזה ׃
אף על פי שהמבזה את החכמים אן לו חלק לעולם הבא אם באו עדים שבזהו אפילו
בדברים חייב נדוי , ומנדין אותו בית דין ברבים וקונסין אותו ליטרא זהב בכל
מקום ונותנין אותו לחכם והמבזה את החכם בדברים אפילו לאחר מיתה מנדין אותו
בית דין וכו׳ ,
“Whosoever despises the wise men has no share in the world to come. But
notwithstanding this, if there come witnesses to prove that he has been
guilty of contempt, even in words, his sentence is excommunication, and
the tribunal (house of judgment) excommunicates him publicly, and
everywhere mulct him in a pound of gold, and give it to the wise man. He
that despiseth a wise man in words, even after his death, is to be
excommunicated by the tribunal,” &c. We now ask the Jews of modern times
what they think of those who made their own personal honour the subject
of legislation, who required the same reverence for their words as the
Word of God, and who dragged up him that refused it before a tribunal,
had him sentenced to pecuniary fine, and excommunication; and, besides
all this, excluded him from the hope of everlasting life? Had such men
any idea of liberty of conscience?
No. III.
RABBINIC INJUSTICE TO WOMEN, SLAVES, AND GENTILES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account