The origin and development of the atomic theory — John Shaqi
The origin and development of the atomic theoryShipley, Maynard
History
The origin and development of the atomic theory
Shipley, Maynard
Atomic theory
Parmenides had already declared that taste, colors, sound and the like
were only names, standing for no objective qualities. Democritus agreed
that sensations _represent_ nothing external to ourselves, though
they are _caused_ by something outside us. For example, what we
call pungency, tartness, bitterness, saltiness, etc., were impressions
produced on the palate by atoms of a certain shape--sharp, rough,
pointed or hooked particles of matter producing an effect of pungency
or acidity. Atoms with smooth surfaces form substances which ordinarily
impress the senses agreeably. From this we learn the effect upon our
palates of certain substances, but these sensations tell us nothing of
the true nature of the substances tasted.
“By the senses,” says Democritus, “we in truth know nothing sure,
but only something that changes according to the disposition of the
body and of the things that enter into it or resist it” (Fragment 9).
True reality lies beyond sense impressions; “truth is in the depths”
(Fragment 11). Our ideas represent our impressions, and are not direct
reproductions of the external objects themselves, “the inner essence of
which is concealed from us.”
This ancient theory of the differences of taste depending on
differences in the shapes--or roughness or smoothness--of the particles
composing substances prevailed even well into the eighteenth century
of our own era; dictionaries of the period still defining acidity,
for example, as due to sharp, pointed particles. Today we still admit
that atoms are qualitatively homogeneous--but by “atoms” we now mean
electrons, the constituent electrical charges which make up the “atoms”
of the chemist. Differences in the number of electrons in atoms confer
upon them qualitative (chemical) differences, though all atoms of any
one element are chemically alike--are homogeneous. Differences in the
number of spatial arrangement of these atoms (in groups or “molecules”)
constitute both physical and chemical differences in substances, i.e.,
in compounds. Quite different substances are produced by combinations
of precisely the same _kinds_ of atoms, but in different
proportions.
Take from a molecule of certain substances one single atom, and they
may be changed from a compound necessary to life and growth into a
deadly poison. Phosphorus is an element, and thus contains but one kind
of atoms; but some (common) phosphorus is yellow and some (amorphous)
is red, varying with the spatial distribution of the atoms in the
molecules composing the phosphorus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account