The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
At the same time the Privy Council received news that, according to
letters from Sir William Musgrave, Tynedale and Reedsdale were loyal,
Cumberland and Westmorland not ill-disposed, Lord Clifford was holding
Carlisle and the Earl of Cumberland Skipton[23]. They thought therefore
that Norfolk had only to deal with Yorkshire. They wrote to him to
engage the rebels in conference while Suffolk prepared to attack them
from the east, and Shrewsbury and Derby on the west. If the rebels could
not be persuaded to accept the limited pardon and give up their
ringleaders, he was to attack at once, for the King would on no account
grant a general pardon. They enclosed the King’s letter, but assured
Norfolk that whatever it might contain the King was as gracious to him
as ever he was in his life, from which it appears that they were rather
nervous about the effect that Henry’s remonstrance might have[24]. Sir
John Russell also carried back a secret letter from the King to
Shrewsbury. It is a high tribute to the old Earl’s character that all
parties trusted him; even the King placed more reliance on him than on
Norfolk, although he now showed his confidence by asking him to do a
dirty piece of work. In his reports Shrewsbury, whenever possible, had
spoken a good word for his old friend Darcy. Henry now commissioned him
to enter into secret negotiations with Darcy and Aske. He was not to
allow the rest of the Council to know anything about it, but if he could
by any means persuade them to come over to the King, he might give them
the pardons, made out, one for Darcy, and the other for Aske, which
Russell had in his possession. “The dates which are left blank you have
power to fill up, but you must do so in such sort that there appear no
diversity of hands.” Was forgery one of the ordinary accomplishments of
a Tudor nobleman? Russell also took a set of articles which Shrewsbury
was empowered to declare if no terms were made with the rebels, but no
copy of these articles has survived[25].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account